Predicted protein targets (top 5)
| gene | UniProt | supporting neighbours | confidence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ | HTT | P42858 | 1/20 | 0.35 |
| ▸ | L3MBTL1 | Q9Y468 | 1/20 | 0.35 |
| ▸ | POLB | P06746 | 1/20 | 0.34 |
| ▸ | SMN1; SMN2 | Q16637 | 1/20 | 0.34 |
| ▸ | MAPT | P10636 | 1/20 | 0.33 |
Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.
Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules
Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.
| Compound | similarity | top predicted | shared targets | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHEMBL3726282 | 0.91 | PDGFRB (0.30) | — | |
| SCHEMBL3728278 | 0.91 | RAB9A (0.31) | SMN1; SMN2 | |
| SCHEMBL3739222 | 0.89 | MEN1 (0.33) | — | |
| SCHEMBL3729101 | 0.89 | PDGFRB (0.32) | — | |
| SCHEMBL3737544 | 0.88 | CNR2 (0.31) | — | |
| SCHEMBL3740907 | 0.87 | MAPK14 (0.30) | — | |
| SCHEMBL13040735 | 0.87 | CNR2 (0.30) | — | |
| SCHEMBL3732950 | 0.86 | — | — | |
| SCHEMBL3732353 | 0.86 | CNR2 (0.30) | — | |
| SCHEMBL3730548 | 0.86 | PDGFRB (0.33) | — |
Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.
Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them
Claimed or disclosed in 7 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.
| Patent | Title | Assignee | Published | Priority | Filing | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US-8415272-B2 | Quinoline derivatives and their use as fungicides | SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) | 2013-04-09 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-8415272-B2 | Quinoline derivatives and their use as fungicides | SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) | 2013-04-09 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-8415272-B2 | Quinoline derivatives and their use as fungicides | SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) | 2013-04-09 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-20100280068-A1 | QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS FUNGICIDES | SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC. (US) | 2010-11-04 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-20100280068-A1 | QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS FUNGICIDES | SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC. (US) | 2010-11-04 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-20100280068-A1 | QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS FUNGICIDES | SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, INC. (US) | 2010-11-04 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| WO-2009087098-A2 | QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS FUNGICIDES | SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) | 2009-07-16 | — | — | WO | disclosed |
Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?
For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.
| Patent | Title | Text reads most about | Predicted target · text-rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| US-20100280068-A1 | QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS FUNGICIDES | CYP1A1, CYP3A7, CYP1A2 | HTT 3475/4885L3MBTL1 1540/4885POLB 4575/4885 |
“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.