SCHEMBL3736264

SCHEMBL3736264

COc1ccc2c(c1OC)C(=O)c1c-2c(N2CCNCC2)nc2ccc(Cl)cc12

nearest known ligand 0.45

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HTR3E A5X5Y0 1/20 0.45
HTR3B O95264 1/20 0.45
HTR3A P46098 1/20 0.45
HTR3D Q70Z44 1/20 0.45
HTR3C Q8WXA8 1/20 0.45
FABP3 P05413 3/20 0.42
FABP4 P15090 3/20 0.42
FABP5 Q01469 3/20 0.42
CYP2D6 P10635 2/20 0.42
CYP2C9 P11712 2/20 0.42
HTR6 P50406 7/20 0.40
AMY1A P0DUB6 1/20 0.40
TOP1 P11387 5/20 0.40
TOP2A P11388 1/20 0.40
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.39
S1PR2 O95136 1/20 0.39
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.39
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.39
HIF1A Q16665 1/20 0.39
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3738550 0.81 AMY1A (0.46) AMY1A
SCHEMBL16895268 0.76 TOP1 (0.54) FABP3FABP4FABP5CYP2D6CYP2C9
SCHEMBL3740972 0.73 TOP1 (0.50) CYP2D6HTR6TOP1PDE10A
SCHEMBL3746375 0.73 TOP1 (0.51) CYP2D6HTR6TOP1KDM4EKMT2A
SCHEMBL3738458 0.71 TOP1 (0.64) CYP2D6HTR6TOP1
SCHEMBL16895272 0.69 NPC1 (0.51) KDM4ELMNA
SCHEMBL3741028 0.67 HTR6 (0.53) CYP2D6HTR6TOP1KDM4EKMT2A
SCHEMBL16895269 0.67 FABP3 (0.50) FABP3FABP4FABP5CYP2D6CYP2C9
SCHEMBL16895266 0.66 ABCG2 (0.53) CYP2D6TOP1KDM4EKMT2A
SCHEMBL16895282 0.66 FABP3 (0.52) FABP3FABP4FABP5CYP2D6CYP2C9

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7829567-B2 Imino-indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2010-11-09 US disclosed
US-20090111987-A1 Imino-Indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2009-04-30 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090111987-A1 Imino-Indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same IMPA1, IMPDH1, IPO5 HTR3E 597/4885HTR3B 757/4885HTR3A 993/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.