SCHEMBL3742852

SCHEMBL3742852

COc1ccc2c(c1)C(=O)c1c-2c(NCCCN(C)C)nc2ccccc12

nearest known ligand 0.57

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TERT O14746 3/20 0.57
POLB P06746 2/20 0.56
RAD52 P43351 2/20 0.56
RXFP1 Q9HBX9 1/20 0.56
FLT3 P36888 4/20 0.54
TOP2A P11388 2/20 0.51
TOP1 P11387 4/20 0.50
NQO1 P15559 1/20 0.48
GSK3A P49840 1/20 0.48
GSK3B P49841 1/20 0.48
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.47
SLC2A1 P11166 1/20 0.47
APOBEC3A P31941 1/20 0.47
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.47
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.47
APOBEC3G Q9HC16 1/20 0.47
PAX8 Q06710 1/20 0.47
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.47
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.47
KDM1A O60341 1/20 0.46

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL3736529 0.94 TERT (0.55) TERTPOLBRAD52RXFP1FLT3
SCHEMBL14796306 0.81 TOP1 (0.46) POLBRAD52RXFP1FLT3TOP1
SCHEMBL3736588 0.81 TOP1 (0.69) POLBRAD52FLT3TOP2ATOP1
SCHEMBL14818434 0.80 TOP1 (0.52) TOP2ATOP1
SCHEMBL7810923 0.80 TOP1 (0.74) TERTPOLBRAD52RXFP1FLT3
SCHEMBL7456175 0.78 TERT (0.48) TERTPOLBRAD52RXFP1FLT3
SCHEMBL5781260 0.78 TOP1 (0.52) TERTPOLBRAD52RXFP1FLT3
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7461395 0.77 TERT (0.48) TERTPOLBRAD52RXFP1FLT3
SCHEMBL6475257 0.75 TOP1 (0.49) TERTPOLBRAD52RXFP1FLT3
SCHEMBL3733796 0.75 GUSB (0.52) POLBGSK3AGSK3BKMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7829567-B2 Imino-indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2010-11-09 US disclosed
US-20090111987-A1 Imino-Indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2009-04-30 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090111987-A1 Imino-Indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same IMPA1, IMPDH1, IPO5 TERT 892/4885POLB 1530/4885RAD52 2491/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.