SCHEMBL3782709

SCHEMBL3782709

CN(C)C1(c2ccccc2)CCC(N[C@@H](Cc2c[nH]c3ccccc23)C(N)=O)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.63

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
OPRL1 P41146 8/20 0.63
OPRM1 P35372 7/20 0.63
ECE1 P42892 3/20 0.48
ITGB2 P05107 1/20 0.46
ICAM1 P05362 1/20 0.46
ITGAL P20701 1/20 0.46
TACR1 P25103 2/20 0.46
TACR2 P21452 1/20 0.46
KDM1A O60341 1/20 0.46
MMP9 P14780 1/20 0.46
MMP8 P22894 1/20 0.46
MMP14 P50281 1/20 0.46
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.45
FPR1 P21462 1/20 0.45
FPR2 P25090 1/20 0.45
ACE P12821 1/20 0.45

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3777996 1.00 OPRL1 (0.63) OPRL1OPRM1ECE1ITGB2ICAM1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL3783843 0.99 OPRL1 (0.62) OPRL1OPRM1ECE1ITGB2ICAM1
SCHEMBL6729772 0.92 OPRL1 (0.65) OPRL1OPRM1ITGB2ICAM1ITGAL
SCHEMBL6551984 0.92 OPRL1 (0.65) OPRL1OPRM1ITGB2ICAM1ITGAL
SCHEMBL5163884 0.92 OPRL1 (0.65) OPRL1OPRM1ITGB2ICAM1ITGAL
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6729807 0.91 OPRL1 (0.64) OPRL1OPRM1ITGB2ICAM1ITGAL
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6729815 0.91 OPRL1 (0.64) OPRL1OPRM1ITGB2ICAM1ITGAL
SCHEMBL4125842 0.91 OPRL1 (0.63) OPRL1OPRM1ITGB2ICAM1ITGAL
SCHEMBL5164576 0.91 OPRL1 (0.63) OPRL1OPRM1
SCHEMBL3791866 0.91 OPRL1 (0.63) OPRL1OPRM1ITGB2ICAM1ITGAL

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 10 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2260022-B1 SUBSTITUTED CYCLOHEXYLDIAMINES GRUENENTHAL GMBH (DE) 2017-01-04 EP claimed
US-8357705-B2 Substituted cyclohexyldiamines GRUENENTHAL GMBH (DE) 2013-01-22 US claimed
EP-2260022-A1 SUBSTITUTED CYCLOHEXYLDIAMINES Grünenthal GmbH (DE) 2010-12-15 EP claimed
WO-2009118174-A1 SUBSTITUTED CYCLOHEXYLDIAMINES Grünenthal GmbH (DE) 2009-10-01 WO claimed
US-20090247591-A1 SUBSTITUTED CYCLOHEXYLDIAMINES GRUNENTHAL GMBH (DE) 2009-10-01 US claimed
EP-2260022-B1 SUBSTITUTED CYCLOHEXYLDIAMINES GRUENENTHAL GMBH (DE) 2017-01-04 EP disclosed
US-8357705-B2 Substituted cyclohexyldiamines GRUENENTHAL GMBH (DE) 2013-01-22 US disclosed
EP-2260022-A1 SUBSTITUTED CYCLOHEXYLDIAMINES Grünenthal GmbH (DE) 2010-12-15 EP disclosed
WO-2009118174-A1 SUBSTITUTED CYCLOHEXYLDIAMINES Grünenthal GmbH (DE) 2009-10-01 WO disclosed
US-20090247591-A1 SUBSTITUTED CYCLOHEXYLDIAMINES GRUNENTHAL GMBH (DE) 2009-10-01 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090247591-A1 SUBSTITUTED CYCLOHEXYLDIAMINES OPRL1, OPRD1, OPRK1 OPRL1 1/4885OPRM1 4/4885ECE1 2099/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.