SCHEMBL3847372

SCHEMBL3847372

C=C[C@]12CC[C@@]3(C)C(C[C@@H](OC(=O)c4cccc(S(N)(=O)=O)c4)[C@@H]3F)C1CCc1cc(OC(C)=O)ccc12

nearest known ligand 0.37

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.37
ESR1 P03372 3/20 0.37
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.37
ADORA3 P0DMS8 2/20 0.37
ATM Q13315 2/20 0.37
PGR P06401 1/20 0.37
AR P10275 1/20 0.37
CHRM1 P11229 1/20 0.37
TBXA2R P21731 1/20 0.37
ADRA1A P35348 1/20 0.37
OPRM1 P35372 1/20 0.37
SLC6A3 Q01959 1/20 0.37
CYP3A4 P08684 2/20 0.36
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.36
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.36
NR3C1 P04150 1/20 0.35
SHBG P04278 1/20 0.35
FYN P06241 1/20 0.35
ADRA2C P18825 1/20 0.35
SLC6A2 P23975 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3847363 0.92 SMN1; SMN2 (0.36) SMN1; SMN2ESR1LMNAADORA3ATM
SCHEMBL2215719 0.91 CA2 (0.41) ESR1CA2RORCSTS
SCHEMBL3845237 0.91 CA2 (0.41) ESR1CA2RORCSTS
SCHEMBL3847345 0.89 RORC (0.33) SMN1; SMN2ESR1LMNAADORA3ATM
SCHEMBL3845835 0.88 SMN1; SMN2 (0.34) SMN1; SMN2ESR1LMNAADORA3ATM
SCHEMBL5152125 0.84 SMN1; SMN2 (0.35) SMN1; SMN2ESR1LMNAADORA3ATM
SCHEMBL3848339 0.84 SMN1; SMN2 (0.35) SMN1; SMN2ESR1LMNAADORA3ATM
SCHEMBL2215975 0.83 CA2 (0.41) ESR1CA2STS
SCHEMBL2213456 0.79 CA2 (0.35) ESR1CA2STS
SCHEMBL3845560 0.76 PTPN2 (0.36) SMN1; SMN2ESR1LMNAADORA3ATM

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2039702-A2 Prodrugs erbeta-selective substances, method for their production and pharmaceutical compounds containing these compositions Bayer Schering Pharma Aktiengesellschaft (DE) 2009-03-25 EP claimed
US-20070123500-A1 Prodrugs of ERbeta-selective substances, processes for their preparation and pharmaceutical compositions comprising these compounds BAYER SCHERING PHARMA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2007-05-31 US claimed
EP-2039702-A2 Prodrugs erbeta-selective substances, method for their production and pharmaceutical compounds containing these compositions Bayer Schering Pharma Aktiengesellschaft (DE) 2009-03-25 EP disclosed
US-20070123500-A1 Prodrugs of ERbeta-selective substances, processes for their preparation and pharmaceutical compositions comprising these compounds BAYER SCHERING PHARMA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2007-05-31 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070123500-A1 Prodrugs of ERbeta-selective substances, processes for their preparation and pharmaceutical compositions comprising these compounds CYP19A1, ESR2, HSD17B11 SMN1; SMN2 4858/4885ESR1 7/4885LMNA 3785/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.