SCHEMBL3871965

SCHEMBL3871965

CN1CCCC(Oc2ccc3nc(-c4cc5ccccc5o4)cn3n2)C1

nearest known ligand 0.47

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MKNK1 Q9BUB5 4/20 0.47
F2RL3 Q96RI0 13/20 0.43
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.39
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.39
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.39
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.39
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.39
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.38
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.38
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.38
DNMT1 P26358 1/20 0.38
EHMT2 Q96KQ7 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3868180 0.85 MKNK1 (0.47) MKNK1F2RL3RAB9AMEN1MAPK1
SCHEMBL3867956 0.84 F2RL3 (0.44) MKNK1F2RL3SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL3871955 0.81 MKNK1 (0.71) MKNK1
SCHEMBL3869278 0.78 CHRNB1 (0.49) MKNK1F2RL3
SCHEMBL15473971 0.78 ADORA2A (0.41) LMNAHPGDKMT2A
SCHEMBL3871956 0.76 MKNK1 (0.40) MKNK1RAB9AMEN1MAPK1KMT2A
SCHEMBL4049609 0.76 L3MBTL1 (0.39) LMNA
SCHEMBL3868156 0.75 HRH3 (0.48) MKNK1F2RL3NPC1LMNAHPGD
SCHEMBL3865641 0.74 DNMT1 (0.46) MKNK1F2RL3DNMT1EHMT2
SCHEMBL3869345 0.69 F2RL3 (0.49) MKNK1F2RL3

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20140135323-A1 OXO-SUBSTITUTED IMIDAZO[1,2B]PYRIDAZINES, THEIR PREPARATION AND USE AS PHARMACEUTICALS BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH (DE) 2014-05-15 US claimed
US-8653076-B2 Oxo-substituted imidazo[1,2B]pyridazines, their preparation and use as pharmaceuticals BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH (DE) 2014-02-18 US claimed
US-20090093475-A1 Oxo-substituted imidazo[1,2b]pyridazines, their preparation and use as pharmaceuticals BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH (DE) 2009-04-09 US claimed
EP-2044071-A1 OOXO-SUBSTITUTED IMIDAZO[1,2b]PYRIDAZINES, PRODUCTION AND USE THEREOF AS DRUGS Bayer Schering Pharma Aktiengesellschaft (DE) 2009-04-08 EP claimed
WO-2007147646-A1 OXO-SUBSTITUTED IMIDAZO[1,2b]PYRIDAZINES, PRODUCTION AND USE THEREOF AS DRUGS BAYER SCHERING PHARMA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2007-12-27 WO claimed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090093475-A1 Oxo-substituted imidazo[1,2b]pyridazines, their preparation and use as pharmaceuticals CDK2, CDK1, MAP4K2 MKNK1 299/4885F2RL3 3095/4885NPC1 3954/4885
US-20140135323-A1 OXO-SUBSTITUTED IMIDAZO[1,2B]PYRIDAZINES, THEIR PREPARATION AND USE AS PHARMACEUTICALS CDK2, CDK1, MAP4K2 MKNK1 299/4885F2RL3 3095/4885NPC1 3954/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.