SCHEMBL3925899

SCHEMBL3925899

O=C1c2ccccc2C(=O)c2c1cccc2-c1ccccc1-c1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.53

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ADORA2A P29274 1/20 0.53
MAPT P10636 7/20 0.53
ALDH1A1 P00352 6/20 0.53
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 5/20 0.53
LMNA P02545 4/20 0.53
MEN1 O00255 5/20 0.50
KMT2A Q03164 5/20 0.50
CDC25B P30305 1/20 0.50
MAPK1 P28482 5/20 0.48
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 5/20 0.48
RAB9A P51151 3/20 0.48
EGFR P00533 3/20 0.48
PABPC1 P11940 3/20 0.48
TDP1 Q9NUW8 2/20 0.48
NSD2 O96028 1/20 0.48
MAOA P21397 3/20 0.48
APAF1 O14727 2/20 0.48
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.48
THRB P10828 2/20 0.48
HTT P42858 2/20 0.48

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL978805 0.91 MAPT (0.57) ADORA2AMAPTALDH1A1L3MBTL1LMNA
SCHEMBL1038974 0.91 ADORA2A (0.57) ADORA2AMAPTALDH1A1L3MBTL1LMNA
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL27523091 0.89 ADORA2A (0.55) ADORA2AMAPTALDH1A1L3MBTL1LMNA
SCHEMBL22797324 0.89 HDAC4 (0.50) MAPTALDH1A1L3MBTL1LMNAMEN1
SCHEMBL29595074 0.87 LMNA (0.59) ADORA2AMAPTALDH1A1L3MBTL1LMNA
SCHEMBL11424452 0.87 HDAC4 (0.52) ADORA2AMAPTALDH1A1L3MBTL1LMNA
SCHEMBL29836726 0.87 MEN1 (0.67) ADORA2AMAPTALDH1A1L3MBTL1LMNA
SCHEMBL9335085 0.87 MEN1 (0.67) ADORA2AMAPTALDH1A1L3MBTL1LMNA
SCHEMBL5010110 0.87 MEN1 (0.67) ADORA2AMAPTALDH1A1L3MBTL1LMNA
SCHEMBL12626745 0.85 MAPT (0.52) ADORA2AMAPTALDH1A1L3MBTL1LMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1947076-B1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING AROMATIC COMPOUNDS IDEMITSU KOSAN CO (JP) 2014-08-13 EP disclosed
US-20090206748-A1 METHOD FOR PRODUCING AROMATIC COMPOUND AND AROMATIC COMPOUND IDEMITSU KOSAN CO., LTD. (JP) 2009-08-20 US disclosed
US-7547809-B2 Method for producing aromatic compound and aromatic compound IDEMITSU KOSAN CO., LTD. (JP) 2009-06-16 US disclosed
EP-1947076-A1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING AROMATIC COMPOUND AND AROMATIC COMPOUND OBTAINED BY THE PROCESS Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. (JP) 2008-07-23 EP disclosed
US-20070060777-A1 Method for producing aromatic compound and aromatic compound IDEMITSU KOSAN CO., LTD. (JP) 2007-03-15 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070060777-A1 Method for producing aromatic compound and aromatic compound TYR, DDC, DDT ADORA2A 3913/4885MAPT 1690/4885ALDH1A1 827/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.