SCHEMBL4368045

SCHEMBL4368045

[CH2]C(C(=O)O)C(=O)C(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.32

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.32
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.32
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.32
THRB P10828 1/20 0.32
RECQL P46063 1/20 0.32
TET2 Q6N021 3/20 0.31
TET3 O43151 1/20 0.31
TET1 Q8NFU7 1/20 0.31
HPGD P15428 2/20 0.30
HSD17B10 Q99714 2/20 0.30
TDP1 Q9NUW8 2/20 0.30
ABCB11 O95342 1/20 0.30
F2 P00734 1/20 0.30
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.30
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.30
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.30
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.30
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.30
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.30
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL752677 0.86
SCHEMBL168567 0.78
SCHEMBL4261212 0.74
SCHEMBL4733794 0.74 ALDH1A1 (0.38) LMNAALDH1A1TSHRTHRBRECQL
SCHEMBL12489061 0.74 ALDH1A1 (0.38) LMNAALDH1A1TSHRTHRBRECQL
SCHEMBL1079489 0.71 TET2 (0.35) LMNAALDH1A1TSHRTHRBRECQL
SCHEMBL1378126 0.67
SCHEMBL6848810 0.67
SCHEMBL28927551 0.67
SCHEMBL28131419 0.67

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 9 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1956910-B1 ONCOGENIC RAS-SPECIFIC CYTOTOXIC COMPOUND AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF UNIV TEXAS (US) 2014-09-17 EP claimed
US-20090286847-A1 ONCOGENIC RAS-SPECIFIC CYTOTOXIC COMPOUND AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM (US) 2009-11-19 US claimed
EP-1956910-A2 ONCOGENIC RAS-SPECIFIC CYTOTOXIC COMPOUND AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF The Board of Regents of The University of Texas System (US) 2008-08-20 EP claimed
WO-2007062399-A2 ONCOGENIC RAS-SPECIFIC CYTOTOXIC COMPOUND AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM (US) 2007-05-31 WO claimed
US-8883841-B2 Oncogenic ras-specific cytotoxic compound and methods of use thereof THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM (US) 2014-11-11 US disclosed
EP-1956910-B1 ONCOGENIC RAS-SPECIFIC CYTOTOXIC COMPOUND AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF UNIV TEXAS (US) 2014-09-17 EP disclosed
US-20090286847-A1 ONCOGENIC RAS-SPECIFIC CYTOTOXIC COMPOUND AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM (US) 2009-11-19 US disclosed
EP-1956910-A2 ONCOGENIC RAS-SPECIFIC CYTOTOXIC COMPOUND AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF The Board of Regents of The University of Texas System (US) 2008-08-20 EP disclosed
WO-2007062399-A2 ONCOGENIC RAS-SPECIFIC CYTOTOXIC COMPOUND AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM (US) 2007-05-31 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090286847-A1 ONCOGENIC RAS-SPECIFIC CYTOTOXIC COMPOUND AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF KRAS, NRAS, HRAS LMNA 3617/4885ALDH1A1 790/4885TSHR 4237/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.