SCHEMBL4548799

SCHEMBL4548799

CNc1cc(Oc2ccc3c(C(=O)Nc4cc(C(C)(C)C)on4)cccc3c2)ncn1

nearest known ligand 0.69

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDR P35968 16/20 0.69
RAF1 P04049 2/20 0.62
MAPK3 P27361 2/20 0.62
FLT1 P17948 3/20 0.49
FLT4 P35916 3/20 0.49
RET P07949 1/20 0.48
PDGFRB P09619 1/20 0.48
KIT P10721 1/20 0.48
TNNI3K Q59H18 2/20 0.48
BRAF P15056 1/20 0.48
MAPK14 Q16539 1/20 0.48
MAP2K7 O14733 1/20 0.46
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.45
PKM P14618 1/20 0.45
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.45
HTT P42858 1/20 0.45
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.45
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.45

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4548774 0.86 KDR (0.69) KDRFLT1RET
SCHEMBL4548801 0.84 KDR (0.80) KDRRAF1FLT1FLT4RET
SCHEMBL4548796 0.82 KDR (0.84) KDRFLT1FLT4RETPDGFRB
SCHEMBL4556267 0.82 KDR (1.00) KDRRAF1FLT1FLT4TNNI3K
SCHEMBL4548793 0.81 KDR (0.84) KDRFLT1FLT4RETPDGFRB
SCHEMBL2748774 0.81 KDR (0.68) KDRRAF1BRAF
SCHEMBL4548934 0.80 KDR (0.68) KDRRAF1RETBRAF
SCHEMBL4548798 0.80 KDR (0.83) KDRFLT1FLT4RETPDGFRB
SCHEMBL2747767 0.80 KDR (0.77) KDRRAF1FLT1FLT4RET
SCHEMBL2434197 0.80 KDR (0.70) KDRRAF1FLT1FLT4TNNI3K

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8178557-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-15 US disclosed
US-8178557-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-15 US disclosed
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2009-07-09 US disclosed
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2009-07-09 US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 US disclosed
EP-1713484-A2 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE AMGEN INC. (US) 2006-10-25 EP disclosed
WO-2005070891-A2 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE AMGEN INC (US) 2005-08-04 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use HGF, HGFAC, MET KDR 354/4885RAF1 1183/4885MAPK3 1600/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.