SCHEMBL4548916

SCHEMBL4548916

O=C(Nc1ccc(Cl)c(C(F)(F)F)c1)c1cccc2cc(Oc3ncnc4[nH]ccc34)ccc12

nearest known ligand 0.76

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDR P35968 15/20 0.76
FLT1 P17948 5/20 0.58
FLT4 P35916 5/20 0.58
BRAF P15056 5/20 0.55
MAPK14 Q16539 1/20 0.55
TNNI3K Q59H18 1/20 0.55
RAF1 P04049 3/20 0.53
PDGFRB P09619 3/20 0.53
KIT P10721 3/20 0.53
PDGFRA P16234 1/20 0.53
FGFR2 P21802 1/20 0.53
FLT3 P36888 1/20 0.53
CDK8 P49336 2/20 0.53
RET P07949 2/20 0.49

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4548922 0.88 KDR (0.79) KDRFLT1FLT4BRAFMAPK14
SCHEMBL4548923 0.87 KDR (0.72) KDRFLT1FLT4BRAFMAPK14
SCHEMBL4812261 0.86 KDR (1.00) KDRFLT1FLT4BRAFMAPK14
SCHEMBL4548921 0.86 KDR (0.79) KDRFLT1FLT4BRAFMAPK14
SCHEMBL4548909 0.86 KDR (0.79) KDRFLT1FLT4BRAFMAPK14
SCHEMBL4548920 0.86 KDR (0.85) KDRFLT1FLT4BRAFMAPK14
SCHEMBL4548924 0.84 KDR (0.71) KDRFLT1FLT4BRAFMAPK14
SCHEMBL4548927 0.84 KDR (0.65) KDRFLT1FLT4BRAFMAPK14
SCHEMBL4548912 0.84 KDR (0.84) KDRFLT1FLT4BRAFMAPK14
SCHEMBL4548941 0.83 KDR (0.77) KDRFLT1FLT4BRAFMAPK14

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 10 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8178557-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-15 US disclosed
US-8178557-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2012-05-15 US disclosed
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2009-07-09 US disclosed
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2009-07-09 US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 US disclosed
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 US disclosed
US-20060241115-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. 2006-10-26 US disclosed
EP-1713484-A2 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE AMGEN INC. (US) 2006-10-25 EP disclosed
WO-2005070891-A2 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USE AMGEN INC (US) 2005-08-04 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060241115-A1 Compounds and methods of use HGF, HGFAC, MET KDR 354/4885FLT1 89/4885FLT4 125/4885
US-20090176774-A1 Compounds and methods of use HGF, HGFAC, MET KDR 354/4885FLT1 89/4885FLT4 125/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.