SCHEMBL4822892

SCHEMBL4822892

O=C(Nc1cccc2cc(Oc3ccnc(C(=O)O)c3)ccc12)c1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.62

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SIRT2 Q8IXJ6 3/20 0.62
SIRT1 Q96EB6 3/20 0.62
SIRT3 Q9NTG7 3/20 0.62
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.52
RAB9A P51151 2/20 0.52
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.52
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.52
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.52
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.52
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.52
KDR P35968 2/20 0.48
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.48
PYGL P06737 5/20 0.48
PYGM P11217 5/20 0.48
FGFR1 P11362 1/20 0.46
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.46
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.45

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4821648 0.92 SIRT2 (0.63) SIRT2SIRT1SIRT3NPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL2746237 0.91 KDR (0.60) SIRT2SIRT1SIRT3KDRFGFR1
SCHEMBL4821996 0.90 SIRT2 (0.52) SIRT2SIRT1SIRT3NPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL4822988 0.89 SIRT2 (0.51) SIRT2SIRT1SIRT3NPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL4812015 0.88 KDR (0.60) SIRT2SIRT1SIRT3NPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL4548758 0.83 KDR (0.59) SIRT2SIRT1SIRT3KDRFGFR1
SCHEMBL2747087 0.83 SIRT2 (0.62) SIRT2SIRT1SIRT3KDRFGFR1
SCHEMBL4548755 0.83 KDR (0.58) SIRT2SIRT1SIRT3NPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL4548767 0.82 KDR (0.58) SIRT2SIRT1SIRT3NPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL2749251 0.82 KDR (0.70) SIRT2SIRT1SIRT3KDRFGFR1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7435823-B2 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. (US) 2008-10-14 US disclosed
US-20060241115-A1 Compounds and methods of use AMGEN INC. 2006-10-26 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060241115-A1 Compounds and methods of use HGF, HGFAC, MET SIRT2 1966/4885SIRT1 1349/4885SIRT3 1430/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.