SCHEMBL4949893

SCHEMBL4949893

CCCCCCCC(CCC)CCCCC

nearest known ligand 0.62

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.62
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.50
THRB P10828 1/20 0.50
DNM1 Q05193 2/20 0.48
OPRM1 P35372 1/20 0.46
GPR84 Q9NQS5 3/20 0.42
FDPS P14324 3/20 0.42
SPHK1 Q9NYA1 1/20 0.42
FFAR1 O14842 1/20 0.42
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.42
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL9712731 1.00 LMNA (0.62) LMNATSHRTHRBDNM1OPRM1
SCHEMBL11330180 1.00 LMNA (0.62) LMNATSHRTHRBDNM1OPRM1
SCHEMBL8026611 1.00 LMNA (0.62) LMNATSHRTHRBDNM1OPRM1
SCHEMBL3630821 1.00 LMNA (0.62) LMNATSHRTHRBDNM1OPRM1
SCHEMBL22471933 1.00 LMNA (0.62) LMNATSHRTHRBDNM1OPRM1
SCHEMBL17822464 1.00 LMNA (0.62) LMNATSHRTHRBDNM1OPRM1
SCHEMBL2592932 1.00 LMNA (0.62) LMNATSHRTHRBDNM1OPRM1
SCHEMBL9304805 1.00 LMNA (0.62) LMNATSHRTHRBDNM1OPRM1
SCHEMBL3634317 1.00 LMNA (0.62) LMNATSHRTHRBDNM1OPRM1
SCHEMBL5500151 1.00 LMNA (0.62) LMNATSHRTHRBDNM1OPRM1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 9 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
CN-122030497-A Fermentation method for cooperatively treating ganoderma lucidum by bacterial enzymes and application of fermentation method in pet food 杭州半边野兽科技有限公司 2026-05-15 CN disclosed
EP-3004072-A1 METHODS FOR PRODUCING FUELS, GASOLINE ADDITIVES, AND LUBRICANTS The Regents of The University of California (US) 2016-04-13 EP disclosed
WO-2014197514-A1 METHODS FOR PRODUCING FUELS, GASOLINE ADDITIVES, AND LUBRICANTS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (US) 2014-12-11 WO disclosed
US-8557565-B2 Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to render them available for biodegradation WAVREK DAVID (US) 2013-10-15 US disclosed
US-8298814-B1 Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Wavrek, David A. (US) 2012-10-30 US disclosed
US-20080242875-A1 DEGRADATION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS TO RENDER THEM AVAILABLE FOR BIODEGRADATION HONG P K ANDY 2008-10-02 US disclosed
EP-1230400-B1 DEGRADATION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS UNIV UTAH RES FOUND (US) 2008-09-24 EP disclosed
EP-1230400-A1 DEGRADATION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS University of Utah Research Foundation (US) 2002-08-14 EP disclosed
WO-2001032936-A1 DEGRADATION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS UNIVERSITY OF UTAH RESEARCH FOUNDATION (US) 2001-05-10 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20080242875-A1 DEGRADATION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS TO RENDER THEM AVAILABLE FOR BIODEGRADATION PAH, AHR, TDO2 LMNA 1818/4885TSHR 2267/4885THRB 2054/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.