Diethyl Hydrogen Phosphate

Diethyl Hydrogen Phosphate

SCHEMBL5069693

CC(C)(C)c1cccc(I)c1C(C)(C)C.CCOP(=O)(O)OCC

nearest known ligand 0.35

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 2/20 0.35
HMGCR P04035 3/20 0.35
NR1I2 O75469 2/20 0.35
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.33
NLRP3 Q96P20 1/20 0.33
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.33
POLB P06746 1/20 0.32
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.32
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.32
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.32
GAA P10253 1/20 0.32
HTT P42858 1/20 0.32
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.31
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.31
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.31
THRB P10828 1/20 0.31
KCNH2 Q12809 1/20 0.30
PTPN5 P54829 1/20 0.30
GABRA1 P14867 1/20 0.30
GABRB2 P47870 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL5069666 0.84 CA2 (0.36) NPSR1CA2TSHRALDH1A1GAA
SCHEMBL1285882 0.78 CA2 (0.46) NPSR1CA2TSHRALDH1A1GABRA1
SCHEMBL29688753 0.78 CA2 (0.46) NPSR1CA2TSHRALDH1A1GABRA1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL5073192 0.76 CA2 (0.44) NPSR1CA2TSHRALDH1A1GABRA1
Malonic Acid SCHEMBL29009140 0.74 RBP4 (0.40) NPSR1CA2TSHRALDH1A1KDM4E
SCHEMBL6544073 0.73 CA2 (0.41) NPSR1CA2TSHRALDH1A1GABRA1
Methanesulfonic Acid Methyl Ester SCHEMBL5073212 0.71 CA2 (0.34) CA2TSHRALDH1A1GABRA1GABRB2
Dichloroacetic Acid SCHEMBL6037446 0.70 CA2 (0.37) NPSR1CA2TSHRALDH1A1KDM4E
Trifluoromethanesulfonic Acid SCHEMBL1286190 0.70 CA2 (0.37) CA2TSHRALDH1A1PTPN5GABRA1
Diethyl Hydrogen Phosphate SCHEMBL29281190 0.70 TSHR (0.50) NPSR1NR1I2TSHRPOLBALDH1A1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7335787-B2 Method for producing onium salt derivatives, and novel onium salt derivatives TOYO GOSEI KOGYO CO., LTD. (JP) 2008-02-26 US disclosed
US-20050176982-A1 Method for producing onium salt derivatives, and novel onium salt derivatives TOYO GOSEI KOGYO CO., LTD. (JP) 2005-08-11 US disclosed
US-6620957-B1 Process for producing onium salt derivative and novel onium salt derivative TOYO GOSEI KOGYO CO., LTD. (JP) 2003-09-16 US disclosed
EP-1164127-A1 PROCESS FOR PRODUCING ONIUM SALT DERIVATIVE AND NOVEL ONIUM SALT DERIVATIVE Toyo Gosei Kogyo Co., Ltd. (JP) 2001-12-19 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050176982-A1 Method for producing onium salt derivatives, and novel onium salt derivatives STS, NANS, GRIK5 NPSR1 1269/4885HMGCR 1816/4885NR1I2 3616/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.