SCHEMBL5086191

SCHEMBL5086191

O=C(O)c1cn(C23CC(C2)C3)c2c(F)c(N3CCC(O)C3)c(F)cc2c1=O

nearest known ligand 0.52

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.52
ALDH1A1 P00352 5/20 0.51
KDM4E B2RXH2 5/20 0.51
HPGD P15428 3/20 0.49
HSD17B10 Q99714 3/20 0.49
KCNH2 Q12809 5/20 0.49
PMP22 Q01453 1/20 0.49
POLB P06746 2/20 0.47
OPRM1 P35372 2/20 0.47
CHRM2 P08172 1/20 0.47
CHRM1 P11229 1/20 0.47
OPRD1 P41143 1/20 0.47
PRKD3 O94806 1/20 0.46
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.46
CLK2 P49760 1/20 0.46
CLK4 Q9HAZ1 1/20 0.46
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.46
TOP1 P11387 5/20 0.43
TOP2A P11388 1/20 0.43
TOP2B Q02880 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL5080350 0.90 ALDH1A1 (0.60) ALDH1A1KCNH2POLBOPRM1CHRM2
SCHEMBL30626301 0.88 LMNA (0.54) LMNAALDH1A1KDM4EHPGDHSD17B10
SCHEMBL29080629 0.88 LMNA (0.54) LMNAALDH1A1KDM4EHPGDHSD17B10
SCHEMBL29080631 0.88 LMNA (0.54) LMNAALDH1A1KDM4EHPGDHSD17B10
SCHEMBL5083980 0.85 KDM4E (0.65) LMNAALDH1A1KDM4EHPGDHSD17B10
SCHEMBL5080567 0.85 KCNH2 (0.49) LMNAALDH1A1KDM4EHPGDHSD17B10
SCHEMBL4731238 0.84 KDM4E (0.53) LMNAALDH1A1KDM4EHPGDHSD17B10
SCHEMBL10784551 0.82 ALDH1A1 (0.65) LMNAALDH1A1KDM4EHPGDHSD17B10
SCHEMBL5086497 0.82 KDM4E (0.47) LMNAALDH1A1KDM4EHPGDHSD17B10
SCHEMBL5084361 0.82 ALDH1A1 (0.49) LMNAALDH1A1KDM4EHPGDHSD17B10

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 7 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-0447484-A1 ANTIBACTERIAL QUINOLONE COMPOUNDS THE UPJOHN COMPANY (US) 1991-09-25 EP claimed
WO-1990006307-A2 ANTIBACTERIAL QUINOLONE COMPOUNDS THE UPJOHN COMPANY (US) 1990-06-14 WO claimed
US-20080044390-A1 Methods and compositions for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders CHDI, INCORPORATED 2008-02-21 US disclosed
US-5385906-A Treating gramnegative and grampositive bacterial infections THE UPJOHN COMPANY (US) 1995-01-31 US disclosed
US-5262417-A Antibacterial quinolone compounds THE UPJOHN COMPANY (US) 1993-11-16 US disclosed
EP-0447484-A1 ANTIBACTERIAL QUINOLONE COMPOUNDS THE UPJOHN COMPANY (US) 1991-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-1990006307-A2 ANTIBACTERIAL QUINOLONE COMPOUNDS THE UPJOHN COMPANY (US) 1990-06-14 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20080044390-A1 Methods and compositions for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders HTT, SNCA, NLN LMNA 415/4885ALDH1A1 2348/4885KDM4E 3242/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.