SCHEMBL5205054

SCHEMBL5205054

COc1ccccc1-c1nc(C)nn1-c1ccc(S(N)(=O)=O)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.64

Predicted protein targets (top 6)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PTGS2 P35354 6/20 0.59
CA2 P00918 3/20 0.58
CA9 Q16790 3/20 0.58
CA1 P00915 2/20 0.58
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.46
PTGS1 P23219 1/20 0.46

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL5201574 0.86 PTGS2 (0.67) PTGS2CA2CA9CA1PTGS1
SCHEMBL6172900 0.83 CA9 (0.47) PTGS2CA2CA9CA1CA12
SCHEMBL5205612 0.80 PTGS2 (0.61) PTGS2CA2CA1PTGS1
SCHEMBL5201569 0.79 PTGS2 (0.62) PTGS2CA2CA9CA1CA12
SCHEMBL5206224 0.78 PTGS2 (0.60) PTGS2CA2CA9CA1CA12
SCHEMBL5202701 0.77 CA1 (0.53) PTGS2CA2CA9CA1PTGS1
SCHEMBL5203044 0.76 CA2 (0.61) PTGS2CA2CA9CA1
SCHEMBL5201832 0.75 PTGS2 (0.66) PTGS2PTGS1
SCHEMBL6014008 0.74 PTGS2 (1.00) PTGS2CA2CA9CA1PTGS1
SCHEMBL5205568 0.74 PTGS2 (0.62) PTGS2CA2CA9CA1CA12

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 12 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1458706-A4 DIARYL 1,2,4-TRIAZOLE DERIVATIVES AS A HIGHLY SELECTIVE CYCLOOXYGENASE-2 INHIBITOR CJ CORP (KR) 2005-06-08 EP claimed
US-20050075373-A1 Diaryl 1,2,4-triazole derivatives as a highly selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor CJ CORP. (KR) 2005-04-07 US claimed
EP-1458706-A1 DIARYL 1,2,4-TRIAZOLE DERIVATIVES AS A HIGHLY SELECTIVE CYCLOOXYGENASE-2 INHIBITOR CJ Corp. (KR) 2004-09-22 EP claimed
WO-2003055875-A1 DIARYL 1,2,4-TRIAZOLE DERIVATIVES AS A HIGHLY SELECTIVE CYCLOOXYGENASE-2 INHIBITOR CJ CORP. (KR) 2003-07-10 WO claimed
EP-1458706-B1 DIARYL 1,2,4-TRIAZOLE DERIVATIVES AS A HIGHLY SELECTIVE CYCLOOXYGENASE-2 INHIBITOR CJ CORP (KR) 2007-07-11 EP disclosed
US-7169929-B2 Diaryl 1,2,4-triazole derivatives as a highly selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor CJ CORP. (KR) 2007-01-30 US disclosed
US-7135572-B2 Diaryl 1,2,4-triazole derivatives as a highly selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor CJ CORP (KR) 2006-11-14 US disclosed
US-20060009495-A1 Diary 1,2,4-triazole derivatives as a highly selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor CJ CORP. (KR) 2006-01-12 US disclosed
EP-1458706-A4 DIARYL 1,2,4-TRIAZOLE DERIVATIVES AS A HIGHLY SELECTIVE CYCLOOXYGENASE-2 INHIBITOR CJ CORP (KR) 2005-06-08 EP disclosed
US-20050075373-A1 Diaryl 1,2,4-triazole derivatives as a highly selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor CJ CORP. (KR) 2005-04-07 US disclosed
EP-1458706-A1 DIARYL 1,2,4-TRIAZOLE DERIVATIVES AS A HIGHLY SELECTIVE CYCLOOXYGENASE-2 INHIBITOR CJ Corp. (KR) 2004-09-22 EP disclosed
WO-2003055875-A1 DIARYL 1,2,4-TRIAZOLE DERIVATIVES AS A HIGHLY SELECTIVE CYCLOOXYGENASE-2 INHIBITOR CJ CORP. (KR) 2003-07-10 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20060009495-A1 Diary 1,2,4-triazole derivatives as a highly selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor PTGS1, PTGS2, PTGES2 PTGS2 2/4885CA2 605/4885CA9 2632/4885
US-20050075373-A1 Diaryl 1,2,4-triazole derivatives as a highly selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor PTGS1, PTGS2, PTGES2 PTGS2 2/4885CA2 519/4885CA9 2615/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.