SCHEMBL5225936

SCHEMBL5225936

CCOC(=O)c1n[nH]c2c1CCc1[nH]nc(N)c1-2

nearest known ligand 0.44

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HTT P42858 3/20 0.44
MAPK10 P53779 2/20 0.44
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.44
KDM4E B2RXH2 5/20 0.39
CCNA2 P20248 2/20 0.38
CDK2 P24941 2/20 0.38
CCNA1 P78396 2/20 0.38
POLB P06746 1/20 0.38
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.36
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.36
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.36
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.36
AURKA O14965 1/20 0.36
RIPK1 Q13546 1/20 0.36
PDE4D Q08499 1/20 0.35
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.35
CYP1A2 P05177 2/20 0.35
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.35
RECQL P46063 1/20 0.35
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL5229930 0.80 HCAR2 (0.35) SMN1; SMN2CCNA2CDK2CCNA1KMT2A
SCHEMBL5231909 0.80 HCAR2 (0.49) KMT2A
SCHEMBL6697184 0.80 CCNA2 (0.47) HTTMAPK10SMN1; SMN2KDM4ECCNA2
SCHEMBL5230280 0.75 CCNA2 (0.57) MAPK10KDM4ECCNA2CDK2CCNA1
SCHEMBL28835657 0.74 POLB (0.47) KDM4ECCNA2CDK2CCNA1POLB
SCHEMBL21995909 0.73 POLB (0.46) MAPK10KDM4ECCNA2CDK2CCNA1
SCHEMBL13935666 0.73 POLB (0.46) MAPK10KDM4ECCNA2CDK2CCNA1
SCHEMBL5951775 0.73 KMT2A (0.58) SMN1; SMN2KDM4EPOLBMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL5079536 0.73 HCAR2 (0.58) SMN1; SMN2KDM4EPOLBMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL12499437 0.72 KDM4E (0.48) SMN1; SMN2KDM4EPOLBMEN1KMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1478357-B1 TRICYCLIC PYRAZOLE DERIVATIVES, PROCESS FOR THEIR PREPARATION AND THEIR USE AS ANTITUMOR AGENTS PFIZER ITALIA SRL (IT) 2007-01-31 EP claimed
US-20050176796-A1 Tricyclic pyrazole derivatives, process for their preparation and their use as antitumor agents PHARMACIA ITALIA S.P.A. (IT) 2005-08-11 US claimed
EP-1478357-A2 TRICYCLIC PYRAZOLE DERIVATIVES, PROCESS FOR THEIR PREPARATION AND THEIR USE AS ANTITUMOR AGENTS Pharmacia Italia S.p.A. (IT) 2004-11-24 EP claimed
WO-2003070236-A2 TRICYCLIC PYRAZOLE DERIVATIVES, PROCESS FOR THEIR PREPARATION AND THEIR USE AS ANTITUMOR AGENTS PHARMACIA ITALIA S.P.A. (IT) 2003-08-28 WO claimed
EP-1478357-B1 TRICYCLIC PYRAZOLE DERIVATIVES, PROCESS FOR THEIR PREPARATION AND THEIR USE AS ANTITUMOR AGENTS PFIZER ITALIA SRL (IT) 2007-01-31 EP disclosed
US-20050176796-A1 Tricyclic pyrazole derivatives, process for their preparation and their use as antitumor agents PHARMACIA ITALIA S.P.A. (IT) 2005-08-11 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050176796-A1 Tricyclic pyrazole derivatives, process for their preparation and their use as antitumor agents TP53, NFATC1, MAP3K15 HTT 882/4885MAPK10 698/4885SMN1; SMN2 1886/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.