SCHEMBL5867977

SCHEMBL5867977

O=C(CN(C(=O)c1ccc2c(Cl)c[nH]c2c1)c1ccc2ccccc2c1)NCC1CCN(C2CCCC2)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.38

Predicted protein targets (top 7)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
F10 P00742 16/20 0.38
PLAT P00750 1/20 0.38
KLKB1 P03952 1/20 0.38
CCR3 P51677 1/20 0.37
BCHE P06276 1/20 0.35
MAOB P27338 1/20 0.35
HRH3 Q9Y5N1 2/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL5868199 0.92 F10 (0.40) F10PLATKLKB1HRH3
SCHEMBL6177113 0.88 KMT2A (0.38) F10PLATKLKB1CCR3
SCHEMBL5867988 0.88 SLC6A4 (0.40) F10PLATKLKB1
SCHEMBL5868118 0.85 F10 (0.39) F10PLATKLKB1
SCHEMBL5867984 0.85 F10 (0.47) F10PLATKLKB1
SCHEMBL6173228 0.84 ACHE (0.41) F10PLATKLKB1BCHE
SCHEMBL5868222 0.84 F10 (0.43) F10PLATKLKB1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL5868092 0.83 HDAC1 (0.38) F10PLATKLKB1BCHE
SCHEMBL5868287 0.83 CCR3 (0.39) F10PLATKLKB1CCR3
SCHEMBL5868300 0.82 F10 (0.41) F10HRH3

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7053078-B2 Serine protease inhibitors ELI LILLY AND COMPANY (US) 2006-05-30 US disclosed
EP-1289954-B1 SERINE PROTEASE INHIBITORS LILLY CO ELI (US) 2005-09-14 EP disclosed
US-6900196-B2 Serine protease inhibitors ELI LILLY AND COMPANY (US) 2005-05-31 US disclosed
US-20040259868-A1 Serine protease inhibitors LIEBESCHUETZ JOHN WALTER (GB) 2004-12-23 US disclosed
US-20030109706-A1 Serine pretease inhibitors ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 2003-06-12 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030109706-A1 Serine pretease inhibitors PRSS1, SERPINE1, HPN F10 68/4885PLAT 22/4885KLKB1 225/4885
US-20040259868-A1 Serine protease inhibitors SERPINE1, PRSS1, SERPINB1 F10 60/4885PLAT 35/4885KLKB1 225/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.