SCHEMBL6200514

SCHEMBL6200514

NOCC#Cc1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.58

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CYP1A2 P05177 2/20 0.58
CYP3A4 P08684 2/20 0.58
CYP2C9 P11712 2/20 0.58
CYP2C19 P33261 2/20 0.58
THPO P40225 1/20 0.58
BLM P54132 1/20 0.56
PMP22 Q01453 1/20 0.56
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.50
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.50
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.50
CA7 P43166 1/20 0.50
CA9 Q16790 1/20 0.50
HTR2A P28223 3/20 0.48
APP P05067 1/20 0.48
MAPT P10636 3/20 0.43
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.42
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.41
HTT P42858 1/20 0.41
SIGMAR1 Q99720 3/20 0.40
HTR2C P28335 2/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7225541 0.98 BLM (0.59) CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2C9CYP2C19THPO
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL9135700 0.86 BLM (0.52) CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2C9CYP2C19THPO
SCHEMBL26048304 0.83 CYP1A2 (0.54) CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2C9CYP2C19THPO
SCHEMBL1276464 0.81 CYP1A2 (0.56) CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2C9CYP2C19THPO
SCHEMBL28345910 0.77 CA12 (0.64) CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2C9CYP2C19THPO
SCHEMBL28548814 0.77 CYP1A2 (0.52) CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2C9CYP2C19THPO
SCHEMBL8349426 0.77 CYP2C19 (0.52) CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2C9CYP2C19THPO
SCHEMBL19827608 0.76 CYP1A2 (0.50) CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2C9CYP2C19THPO
SCHEMBL9315411 0.76 IDO1 (0.48) CYP1A2CYP3A4CYP2C9CYP2C19THPO
SCHEMBL6201292 0.75 APP (0.55) CYP3A4CA12CA1CA2CA7

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-3414229-B1 QUINOLINONE LYSYL OXIDASE-LIKE 2 INHIBITORS AND USES THEREOF PHARMAKEA INC (US) 2021-06-16 EP disclosed
US-8722678-B2 Fungicidal oximes and hydrazones E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY (US) 2014-05-13 US disclosed
US-20130030002-A1 FUNGICIDAL OXIMES AND HYDRAZONES E I DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY (US) 2013-01-31 US disclosed
EP-1266887-B1 Indenoindoline derivatives, their process of preparation and pharmaceutical compositions containing them SERVIER LAB (FR) 2005-08-17 EP disclosed
CN-1390834-A Indenoindolone compounds, their preparation and medicinal compositions containing them SEUVILE LAB (FR) 2003-01-15 CN disclosed
EP-1266887-A2 Indenoindoline derivatives, their process of preparation and pharmaceutical compositions containing them Les Laboratoires Servier (FR) 2002-12-18 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20130030002-A1 FUNGICIDAL OXIMES AND HYDRAZONES NOX1, QSOX1, XDH CYP1A2 26/4885CYP3A4 113/4885CYP2C9 49/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.