SCHEMBL6202615

SCHEMBL6202615

COc1cc(OC)c2c(c1)-c1c(c3cc(O)ccc3n1CCN(C)C)C2=O

nearest known ligand 0.47

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
WEE1 P30291 10/20 0.47
CHEK1 O14757 7/20 0.43
SRC P12931 2/20 0.43
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.42
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.42
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.42
PIK3CA P42336 2/20 0.42
MTOR P42345 2/20 0.42
PIK3CG P48736 2/20 0.42
ELANE P08246 1/20 0.41
ESR1 P03372 3/20 0.39
KDR P35968 2/20 0.39
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.37
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.37
HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.37
TDP1 Q9NUW8 2/20 0.37

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6495062 0.85 WEE1 (0.50) WEE1CHEK1SRCPIK3CAMTOR
SCHEMBL6498760 0.84 WEE1 (0.48) WEE1CHEK1SRCPIK3CAMTOR
SCHEMBL6202618 0.78 WEE1 (0.36) WEE1CHEK1SRCPIK3CAMTOR
SCHEMBL7252385 0.78 WEE1 (0.36) WEE1CHEK1SRCPIK3CAMTOR
SCHEMBL6504952 0.68 WEE1 (0.41) WEE1ALDH1A1KDM4EHPGDTDP1
SCHEMBL6504264 0.68 PTGDR2 (0.41) WEE1CHEK1ALDH1A1TDP1
SCHEMBL6498347 0.68 TDP1 (0.61) WEE1CHEK1SRCPIK3CAMTOR
SCHEMBL6503691 0.68 TDP1 (0.40) WEE1CHEK1HPGDHSD17B10TDP1
SCHEMBL6505761 0.68 PTGDR2 (0.41) WEE1CHEK1ALDH1A1TDP1
SCHEMBL6505751 0.68 PTGDR2 (0.41) WEE1CHEK1ALDH1A1TDP1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1266887-B1 Indenoindoline derivatives, their process of preparation and pharmaceutical compositions containing them SERVIER LAB (FR) 2005-08-17 EP disclosed
US-6627650-B2 An isomer thereof, or an addition salt thereof with a pharmaceutically acceptable acid or base. Medicinal products containing the same which are useful as anti- cancer agents. LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2003-09-30 US disclosed
US-20030125369-A1 Indeno(1,2-b)indole oximes or indeno(1,2-b) indole hydrazones used as anticancer agent LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2003-07-03 US disclosed
EP-1266887-A2 Indenoindoline derivatives, their process of preparation and pharmaceutical compositions containing them Les Laboratoires Servier (FR) 2002-12-18 EP disclosed
US-20020173531-A1 Indenoindolone compounds LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2002-11-21 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030125369-A1 Indeno(1,2-b)indole oximes or indeno(1,2-b) indole hydrazones used as anticancer agent IDO1, IDO2, AHR WEE1 1065/4885CHEK1 1422/4885SRC 904/4885
US-20020173531-A1 Indenoindolone compounds MTNR1A, MTNR1B, CYP11B1 WEE1 3618/4885CHEK1 4552/4885SRC 4730/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.