SCHEMBL6282353

SCHEMBL6282353

O=C(Nc1ccc(Cl)cc1)Nc1ncc(C2CC2)s1

nearest known ligand 0.68

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CCNE1 P24864 8/20 0.68
CDK2 P24941 8/20 0.68
CDK5 Q00535 8/20 0.68
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 6/20 0.65
RAB9A P51151 6/20 0.65
MEN1 O00255 3/20 0.65
KMT2A Q03164 3/20 0.65
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.65
NFKB1 P19838 1/20 0.65
NFKB2 Q00653 1/20 0.65
RELA Q04206 1/20 0.65
CNR1 P21554 1/20 0.60
HTT P42858 2/20 0.53
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.53
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.53
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.53
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.53
CASP3 P42574 1/20 0.53
SENP8 Q96LD8 1/20 0.53
SENP7 Q9BQF6 1/20 0.53

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6286065 0.88 CCNE1 (0.70) CCNE1CDK2CDK5SMN1; SMN2RAB9A
SCHEMBL6286722 0.86 CCNE1 (0.68) CCNE1CDK2CDK5SMN1; SMN2RAB9A
SCHEMBL6281751 0.86 CDK2 (0.90) CCNE1CDK2CDK5SMN1; SMN2RAB9A
SCHEMBL6287998 0.85 CCNE1 (0.70) CCNE1CDK2CDK5SMN1; SMN2RAB9A
SCHEMBL6288023 0.85 CCNE1 (0.66) CCNE1CDK2CDK5SMN1; SMN2RAB9A
SCHEMBL6288092 0.83 CCNE1 (0.64) CCNE1CDK2CDK5SMN1; SMN2RAB9A
SCHEMBL6286080 0.82 CCNE1 (0.62) CCNE1CDK2CDK5MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL6283947 0.82 CCNE1 (0.62) CCNE1CDK2CDK5SMN1; SMN2RAB9A
SCHEMBL5782078 0.81 CDK2 (1.00) CCNE1CDK2CDK5SMN1; SMN2RAB9A
SCHEMBL6287953 0.79 CCNE1 (0.69) CCNE1CDK2CDK5RAB9AMEN1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20040157827-A1 2-Ureido-thiazole derivatives, process for their preparation, and their use as antitumor agents PEVARELLO PAOLO (IT) 2004-08-12 US claimed
US-20030187040-A1 2-Ureido-thiazole derivatives, process for their preparation, and their use as antitumor agents PHARMACIA & UPJOHN SPA (IT) 2003-10-02 US claimed
US-6863647-B2 2-Ureido-thiazole derivatives, process for their preparation, and their use as antitumor agents PHARMACIA & UPJOHN S.P.A. (IT) 2005-03-08 US disclosed
US-20040157827-A1 2-Ureido-thiazole derivatives, process for their preparation, and their use as antitumor agents PEVARELLO PAOLO (IT) 2004-08-12 US disclosed
US-20030187040-A1 2-Ureido-thiazole derivatives, process for their preparation, and their use as antitumor agents PHARMACIA & UPJOHN SPA (IT) 2003-10-02 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030187040-A1 2-Ureido-thiazole derivatives, process for their preparation, and their use as antitumor agents UCK2, ULK3, CDK2 CCNE1 83/4885CDK2 3/4885CDK5 129/4885
US-20040157827-A1 2-Ureido-thiazole derivatives, process for their preparation, and their use as antitumor agents UCK2, ULK3, CDK2 CCNE1 83/4885CDK2 3/4885CDK5 129/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.