SCHEMBL6432989

SCHEMBL6432989

N=C(N)Nc1ncc(Cl)c2ccc(C(=O)NC3(C(=O)O)CCCC3)cc12

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 10)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PLAU P00749 11/20 0.46
PLG P00747 6/20 0.46
PLAT P00750 4/20 0.46
LPAR1 Q92633 2/20 0.41
GPR132 Q9UNW8 1/20 0.39
FABP4 P15090 4/20 0.39
FABP5 Q01469 4/20 0.39
DGAT2 Q96PD7 1/20 0.36
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.35
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6433771 0.86 PLAU (0.51) PLAUPLGPLATLPAR1DGAT2
SCHEMBL6432884 0.80 PLAU (0.71) PLAUPLGPLAT
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6438610 0.80 PLAU (0.44) PLAUPLGPLATFABP4FABP5
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6432895 0.79 PLAU (0.70) PLAUPLGPLAT
SCHEMBL7085779 0.79 PLAU (0.72) PLAUPLGPLAT
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6436566 0.79 PLAU (0.70) PLAUPLGPLAT
SCHEMBL6437186 0.78 PLAU (0.71) PLAUPLGPLAT
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6436711 0.77 PLAU (0.70) PLAUPLGPLAT
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7447057 0.77 CA1 (0.46) PLAU
SCHEMBL6436503 0.76 CA1 (0.48) PLAU

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885PLAT 48/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885PLAT 48/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.