Predicted protein targets (top 11)
| gene | UniProt | supporting neighbours | confidence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ | PLAU | P00749 | 4/20 | 0.50 |
| ▸ | PLAT | P00750 | 2/20 | 0.45 |
| ▸ | LMNA | P02545 | 3/20 | 0.42 |
| ▸ | POLB | P06746 | 2/20 | 0.42 |
| ▸ | SMN1; SMN2 | Q16637 | 1/20 | 0.42 |
| ▸ | ALDH1A1 | P00352 | 2/20 | 0.41 |
| ▸ | VCAM1 | P19320 | 1/20 | 0.40 |
| ▸ | CCR8 | P51685 | 1/20 | 0.39 |
| ▸ | PLG | P00747 | 1/20 | 0.38 |
| ▸ | TDP1 | Q9NUW8 | 1/20 | 0.38 |
| ▸ | L3MBTL1 | Q9Y468 | 1/20 | 0.38 |
Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.
Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules
Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.
| Compound | similarity | top predicted | shared targets | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHEMBL6433605 | 1.00 | PLAU (0.50) | PLAUPLATLMNAPOLBSMN1; SMN2 | |
| SCHEMBL6433826 | 0.88 | PLAU (0.50) | PLAUPLATLMNAPLG | |
| SCHEMBL6433740 | 0.88 | PLAU (0.50) | PLAUPLATLMNAPLG | |
| SCHEMBL6433745 | 0.88 | PLAU (0.50) | PLAUPLATLMNAPLG | |
| SCHEMBL6433534 | 0.87 | PLAU (0.56) | PLAUPLATALDH1A1PLG | |
| SCHEMBL6436244 | 0.87 | PLAU (0.51) | PLAUPLATLMNAPOLBSMN1; SMN2 | |
| SCHEMBL6433537 | 0.87 | PLAU (0.56) | PLAUPLATALDH1A1PLG | |
| SCHEMBL6436237 | 0.87 | PLAU (0.51) | PLAUPLATLMNAPOLBSMN1; SMN2 | |
| SCHEMBL7373055 | 0.87 | PLAU (0.56) | PLAUPLATALDH1A1PLG | |
| Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6434303 | 0.86 | PLAU (0.55) | PLAUPLATALDH1A1PLG |
Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.
Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them
Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.
| Patent | Title | Assignee | Published | Priority | Filing | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US-20050026836-A1 | Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue | DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) | 2005-02-03 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-20030199440-A1 | Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue | PFIZER INC. | 2003-10-23 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| EP-1077945-B1 | ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS | PFIZER (US) | 2003-01-08 | — | — | EP | disclosed |
| US-6093731-A | Isoquinolines | PFIZER INC. | 2000-07-25 | — | — | US | disclosed |
Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?
For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.
| Patent | Title | Text reads most about | Predicted target · text-rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| US-20030199440-A1 | Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue | MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 | PLAU 119/4885PLAT 48/4885LMNA 1451/4885 |
| US-20050026836-A1 | Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue | MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 | PLAU 119/4885PLAT 48/4885LMNA 1451/4885 |
“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.