SCHEMBL6436244

SCHEMBL6436244

CCOC(=O)C1CCC(NS(=O)(=O)c2ccc3c(Cl)cnc(Cl)c3c2)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 10)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PLAU P00749 2/20 0.51
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.47
POLB P06746 2/20 0.47
PLAT P00750 1/20 0.45
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.44
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.44
VCAM1 P19320 1/20 0.43
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.43
PKM P14618 1/20 0.41
HTT P42858 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6436237 1.00 PLAU (0.51) PLAULMNAPOLBPLATSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6433609 0.87 PLAU (0.50) PLAULMNAPOLBPLATSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6433605 0.87 PLAU (0.50) PLAULMNAPOLBPLATSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6433522 0.86 PLAU (0.51) PLAULMNAPLATSMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6433517 0.86 PLAU (0.51) PLAULMNAPLATSMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6433510 0.80 PLAU (0.70) PLAULMNAPOLBSMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL516615 0.75 KMT2A (0.58) PLAULMNAPOLBPLATSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6433740 0.74 PLAU (0.50) PLAULMNAPLAT
SCHEMBL6433745 0.74 PLAU (0.50) PLAULMNAPLAT
SCHEMBL6433826 0.74 PLAU (0.50) PLAULMNAPLAT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885LMNA 1451/4885POLB 476/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885LMNA 1451/4885POLB 476/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.