SCHEMBL6433710

SCHEMBL6433710

COC(=O)CS(=O)(=O)N1CCC2(CC1)OCCO2

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.51
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.50
MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.50
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.48
KMT2A Q03164 4/20 0.48
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.48
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.48
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.43
TSHR P16473 2/20 0.43
POLB P06746 1/20 0.43
GAA P10253 1/20 0.40
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.40

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1199921 0.79 GLA (0.46) L3MBTL1LMNAMAPK1ALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL21798284 0.77 TSHR (0.38) L3MBTL1ALDH1A1KMT2ATSHRGAA
SCHEMBL17557666 0.73 CYP3A4 (0.40) L3MBTL1LMNAMAPK1ALDH1A1CYP2C19
SCHEMBL17557750 0.72 CNR1 (0.36) ALDH1A1TSHRPOLBGAAHPGD
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL17557631 0.72 CYP3A4 (0.40) L3MBTL1ALDH1A1CYP2C19SMN1; SMN2TSHR
SCHEMBL6437637 0.72 ALDH1A1 (0.44) L3MBTL1LMNAMAPK1ALDH1A1KMT2A
SCHEMBL6433171 0.70 CYP2C19 (0.45) L3MBTL1LMNAMAPK1ALDH1A1KMT2A
SCHEMBL21798263 0.69 KCNQ3 (0.33) TSHRGAA
SCHEMBL2080828 0.69 POLB (0.51) LMNAMAPK1ALDH1A1KMT2AMEN1
SCHEMBL3244130 0.69 POLB (0.51) L3MBTL1LMNAMAPK1ALDH1A1KMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1181017-B1 METALLOPROTEASE INHIBITORS PFIZER LTD (GB) 2003-04-16 EP disclosed
US-6511993-B1 Substituted alpha-aminosulphonyl-acetohydroxamic acids which are inhibitors of zinc-dependent metalloprotease enzymes PFIZER INC. 2003-01-28 US disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
EP-1181017-A1 METALLOPROTEASE INHIBITORS Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-02-27 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
WO-2000074681-A1 METALLOPROTEASE INHIBITORS PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2000-12-14 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 L3MBTL1 2500/4885LMNA 1451/4885MAPK1 2355/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 L3MBTL1 2500/4885LMNA 1451/4885MAPK1 2355/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.