SCHEMBL6434727

SCHEMBL6434727

Cc1ccccc1CN(CC(=O)OC(C)(C)C)S(=O)(=O)c1ccc2c(Cl)cnc(Cl)c2c1

nearest known ligand 0.45

Predicted protein targets (top 17)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PLAU P00749 6/20 0.45
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.44
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.40
HTT P42858 1/20 0.40
RECQL P46063 1/20 0.40
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.40
NR1D1 P20393 2/20 0.40
TAS2R14 Q9NYV8 2/20 0.39
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.39
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.39
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.39
KEAP1 Q14145 3/20 0.38
PLG P00747 2/20 0.37
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.35
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.35
TRPM8 Q7Z2W7 1/20 0.34
PLAT P00750 1/20 0.34

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6438243 0.90 TP53 (0.45) PLAUMAPTLMNASMN1; SMN2NR1D1
SCHEMBL6433131 0.88 PLAU (0.58) PLAUMAPTSMN1; SMN2NR1D1TAS2R14
SCHEMBL6436490 0.87 PLAU (0.44) PLAUMAPTLMNAHTTRECQL
SCHEMBL6432952 0.86 PLAU (0.47) PLAUSMN1; SMN2NR1D1PLGALDH1A1
SCHEMBL7390607 0.85 PLAU (0.44) PLAUMAPTLMNAHTTRECQL
SCHEMBL6433766 0.84 PLAU (0.51) PLAUMAPTLMNANR1D1TAS2R14
SCHEMBL6436535 0.84 PLAU (0.49) PLAUHTTRECQLSMN1; SMN2NR1D1
SCHEMBL6435665 0.83 PLAU (0.49) PLAUMAPTLMNANR1D1TSHR
SCHEMBL6433730 0.82 PLAU (0.47) PLAUTAS2R14ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6433815 0.82 PLAU (0.47) PLAULMNATAS2R14ALDH1A1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885MAPT 2392/4885LMNA 1451/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885MAPT 2392/4885LMNA 1451/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.