SCHEMBL6432952

SCHEMBL6432952

CC(C)(C)OC(=O)CN(Cc1ccccn1)S(=O)(=O)c1ccc2c(Cl)cnc(Cl)c2c1

nearest known ligand 0.47

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PLAU P00749 5/20 0.47
PDE4A P27815 1/20 0.42
PDE4B Q07343 1/20 0.42
PDE4C Q08493 1/20 0.42
PDE4D Q08499 1/20 0.42
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.41
CXCR3 P49682 5/20 0.41
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.39
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.39
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.39
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.39
HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.39
TRPM8 Q7Z2W7 1/20 0.39
PLG P00747 1/20 0.38
KCNA5 P22460 1/20 0.38
NR1D1 P20393 2/20 0.38
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.38
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6433131 0.88 PLAU (0.58) PLAUALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2TRPM8PLG
SCHEMBL6438996 0.87 PLAU (0.46) PLAUPDE4APDE4BPDE4CPDE4D
SCHEMBL6434727 0.86 PLAU (0.45) PLAUALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2TRPM8PLG
SCHEMBL6436535 0.86 PLAU (0.49) PLAUALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2HSD17B10TRPM8
SCHEMBL6435665 0.85 PLAU (0.49) PLAUPDE4APDE4BPDE4CPDE4D
SCHEMBL6438243 0.84 TP53 (0.45) PLAUALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2NR1D1
SCHEMBL6433766 0.84 PLAU (0.51) PLAUPLGNR1D1
SCHEMBL6433730 0.82 PLAU (0.47) PLAUCXCR3ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6433815 0.82 PLAU (0.47) PLAUCXCR3ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6434229 0.81 PLAU (0.54) PLAUKMT2AALDH1A1ALOX15PLG

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PDE4A 1523/4885PDE4B 1705/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PDE4A 1523/4885PDE4B 1705/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.