SCHEMBL6436550

SCHEMBL6436550

CC(C)(C)OC(=O)[C@H](NS(=O)(=O)c1ccc2c(Cl)cnc(Cl)c2c1)C(C)(C)C

nearest known ligand 0.58

Predicted protein targets (top 7)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PLAU P00749 18/20 0.58
PLG P00747 10/20 0.47
PLAT P00750 4/20 0.47
MMP1 P03956 1/20 0.35
MMP9 P14780 1/20 0.35
MMP13 P45452 1/20 0.35
ADAM17 P78536 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6432675 0.89 PLAU (0.56) PLAUPLGPLATMMP1MMP9
SCHEMBL6437744 0.89 PLAU (0.56) PLAUPLGPLATMMP1MMP9
SCHEMBL6434806 0.88 PLAU (0.54) PLAUPLGPLAT
SCHEMBL7403925 0.85 PLAU (0.54) PLAUPLGPLATMMP1MMP9
SCHEMBL6433840 0.84 PLAU (0.46) PLAUPLGPLAT
SCHEMBL6435266 0.84 PLAU (0.46) PLAUPLGPLAT
SCHEMBL6433798 0.82 PLAU (0.49) PLAUPLGPLATMMP9
SCHEMBL6434690 0.82 PLAU (0.46) PLAUPLGPLATMMP9
SCHEMBL6437740 0.79 PLAU (0.61) PLAUPLGPLAT
SCHEMBL6436403 0.79 PLAU (0.52) PLAUPLGPLAT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885PLAT 48/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885PLAT 48/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.