SCHEMBL6436403

SCHEMBL6436403

CC(C)(C)OC(=O)CNS(=O)(=O)c1ccc2c(Cl)cnc(Cl)c2c1

nearest known ligand 0.52

Predicted protein targets (top 13)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PLAU P00749 16/20 0.52
PLG P00747 7/20 0.46
PLAT P00750 4/20 0.46
GAA P10253 2/20 0.38
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.38
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.38
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.38
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.38
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.38
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.38
MEP1B Q16820 1/20 0.38
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.38
HTT P42858 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6433183 0.89 PLAU (0.53) PLAUPLGPLATGAASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6432761 0.85 PLAU (0.51) PLAUPLGPLAT
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6432757 0.84 PLAU (0.50) PLAUPLGPLAT
SCHEMBL7407412 0.82 PLAU (0.49) PLAUPLGPLATGAASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6435266 0.82 PLAU (0.46) PLAUPLGPLATALDH1A1RAB9A
SCHEMBL6434229 0.80 PLAU (0.54) PLAUPLGPLATALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6434806 0.80 PLAU (0.54) PLAUPLGPLATKDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL6436550 0.79 PLAU (0.58) PLAUPLGPLAT
SCHEMBL6434389 0.79 PTPRC (0.49) GAAKDM4EALDH1A1HPGD
SCHEMBL6432675 0.78 PLAU (0.56) PLAUPLGPLATGAAKDM4E

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885PLAT 48/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885PLAT 48/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.