SCHEMBL6436561

SCHEMBL6436561

COC(=O)C1(NCc2ccc3c(Cl)cnc(Cl)c3c2)CCCC1

nearest known ligand 0.41

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PLAU P00749 10/20 0.41
PLAT P00750 5/20 0.41
PLG P00747 5/20 0.37
TSHR P16473 2/20 0.37
DGAT2 Q96PD7 1/20 0.35
PDE5A O76074 1/20 0.33
SSTR3 P32745 1/20 0.33
P2RX7 Q99572 1/20 0.32
OPRL1 P41146 1/20 0.32
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.32
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.32
P2RY12 Q9H244 1/20 0.32

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6436084 0.85 PLAU (0.41) PLAUPLATPLGDGAT2PDE5A
SCHEMBL6434630 0.77 PLAU (0.61) PLAUPLATPLGSMN1; SMN2
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6438610 0.72 PLAU (0.44) PLAUPLATPLGOPRL1
SCHEMBL6434323 0.72 PLAU (0.51) PLAUPLATPLGDGAT2SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL12156630 0.71 EPHX1 (0.43)
SCHEMBL6433361 0.70 PLAU (0.77) PLAUPLATPLGSMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL29852310 0.70 P4HTM (0.44) TSHRSSTR3SMN1; SMN2MAPK1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL29927774 0.69 P4HTM (0.43) TSHRSSTR3SMN1; SMN2MAPK1
SCHEMBL6433521 0.69 PLAU (0.61) PLAUPLATPLG
SCHEMBL16838925 0.69 CTSK (0.46) SSTR3

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLAT 48/4885PLG 33/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLAT 48/4885PLG 33/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.