SCHEMBL6437720

SCHEMBL6437720

CN1CCN(S(=O)(=O)c2ccc3c(Cl)cnc(NC(=N)N)c3c2)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.67

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PLAU P00749 9/20 0.67
PLG P00747 2/20 0.47
PLAT P00750 1/20 0.47
VCAM1 P19320 1/20 0.46
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.45
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.45
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.45
GAA P10253 1/20 0.45
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.45
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.45
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.45
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.45
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.44
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.44
HTT P42858 2/20 0.43
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6434509 0.90 PLAU (0.65) PLAUVCAM1GAAMAPTLMNA
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6990751 0.89 PLAU (0.64) PLAUVCAM1GAAMAPTLMNA
SCHEMBL6438379 0.87 PLAU (0.67) PLAUPLATMEN1KMT2AUSP2
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6995674 0.86 PLAU (0.66) PLAUPLGPLATMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL7371807 0.81 PLAU (0.49) PLAUPLGPLAT
SCHEMBL6436023 0.81 PLAU (0.75) PLAUPLGPLATUSP2HTT
SCHEMBL6437735 0.81 PLAU (0.61) PLAUPLGPLAT
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6435216 0.80 PLAU (0.74) PLAUPLGPLAT
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6993335 0.79 PLAU (0.60) PLAUPLGPLAT
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6999930 0.79 PLAU (0.68) PLAUVCAM1MEN1KMT2AATM

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 12 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1023268-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER LTD (GB) 2003-05-21 EP claimed
US-6248738-B1 ANTIULCER AGENTS, ANGIOGENESIS INHIBITORS, ANTIMETASTASIS AGENTS, ANTITUMOR AGENTS PFIZER INC. 2001-06-19 US claimed
EP-1023268-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS Pfizer Limited (GB) 2000-08-02 EP claimed
WO-1999020608-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 1999-04-29 WO claimed
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1023268-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER LTD (GB) 2003-05-21 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
US-6248738-B1 ANTIULCER AGENTS, ANGIOGENESIS INHIBITORS, ANTIMETASTASIS AGENTS, ANTITUMOR AGENTS PFIZER INC. 2001-06-19 US disclosed
EP-1023268-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS Pfizer Limited (GB) 2000-08-02 EP disclosed
WO-1999020608-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 1999-04-29 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885PLAT 48/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885PLAT 48/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.