SCHEMBL6437765

SCHEMBL6437765

N=C(N)N(Cl)c1cncc2cc(S(=O)(=O)N(CC(=O)O)CC3CCCC3)ccc12

nearest known ligand 0.56

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PLAU P00749 4/20 0.56
PLG P00747 1/20 0.56
HTR2A P28223 5/20 0.36
HTR2C P28335 5/20 0.36
HTR7 P34969 5/20 0.36
PTGES O14684 2/20 0.34
TAS2R14 Q9NYV8 3/20 0.33
TRPM8 Q7Z2W7 1/20 0.32
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.32
S1PR1 P21453 1/20 0.32
BCHE P06276 1/20 0.31
EGLN2 Q96KS0 1/20 0.31
EGLN1 Q9GZT9 1/20 0.31
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6438808 0.99 PLAU (0.55) PLAUPLGHTR2AHTR2CHTR7
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6433485 0.98 PLAU (0.54) PLAUPLGHTR2AHTR2CHTR7
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7366869 0.88 PLAU (0.41) PLAUPLGALDH1A1
SCHEMBL7369744 0.88 PLG (0.43) PLAUPLGHTR2AHTR2CHTR7
SCHEMBL7053009 0.87 PLG (0.43) PLAUPLGHTR2AHTR2CHTR7
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6434570 0.81 PLAU (0.46) PLAUPLGALDH1A1
SCHEMBL7366690 0.81 PLAU (0.56) PLAUPLGHTR2AHTR2CHTR7
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7363276 0.80 PLAU (0.55) PLAUPLGHTR2AHTR2CHTR7
SCHEMBL7377717 0.80 PLAU (0.45) PLAUPLGALDH1A1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7370990 0.80 PLAU (0.55) PLAUPLGHTR2AHTR2CHTR7

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885HTR2A 4290/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885HTR2A 4290/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.