SCHEMBL6438612

SCHEMBL6438612

COC(=O)C1(NS(=O)(=O)c2ccc3c(N(Cl)C(=N)N)cncc3c2)CCN(C)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 10)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PLAU P00749 9/20 0.46
PLG P00747 6/20 0.46
PLAT P00750 4/20 0.40
F10 P00742 2/20 0.36
PARG Q86W56 4/20 0.32
HTR6 P50406 1/20 0.31
SCN9A Q15858 2/20 0.31
MMP1 P03956 1/20 0.30
MMP9 P14780 1/20 0.30
MMP13 P45452 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL7372430 0.91 PLAU (0.44) PLAUPLGPLATF10PARG
SCHEMBL7367246 0.89 PLAU (0.44) PLAUPLGPLATMMP1MMP9
SCHEMBL7366584 0.85 PLAU (0.57) PLAUPLGPLATF10
SCHEMBL7375080 0.83 PLAU (0.54) PLAUPLGPLATF10PARG
SCHEMBL6437182 0.82 PLAU (0.52) PLAUPLGPLATF10PARG
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6436707 0.81 PLAU (0.51) PLAUPLGPLATF10PARG
SCHEMBL6438599 0.81 PLAU (0.52) PLAUPLGPLATF10PARG
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6436565 0.80 PLAU (0.51) PLAUPLGPLATF10PARG
SCHEMBL6965698 0.79 PLAU (0.54) PLAUPLGPLATF10MMP1
SCHEMBL6976393 0.79 PLAU (0.47) PLAUPLGPLATMMP1MMP13

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885PLAT 48/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PLAU 119/4885PLG 33/4885PLAT 48/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.