SCHEMBL6456689

SCHEMBL6456689

Cc1cccc(Oc2ncccc2C(=O)NC2CCC(Nc3cc(C)c4ccccc4n3)CC2)c1

nearest known ligand 0.48

Predicted protein targets (top 15)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.47
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.47
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.47
RXFP1 Q9HBX9 3/20 0.45
TP53 P04637 2/20 0.45
CNR1 P21554 1/20 0.44
CNR2 P34972 1/20 0.44
ADRA2A P08913 1/20 0.44
MCHR1 Q99705 1/20 0.44
PDE10A Q9Y233 1/20 0.43
PDE4B Q07343 1/20 0.43
PDE4D Q08499 1/20 0.43
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.42
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.42
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6456678 1.00 LMNA (0.47) LMNAKDM4ESMN1; SMN2RXFP1TP53
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6457588 0.99 LMNA (0.46) LMNAKDM4ESMN1; SMN2RXFP1TP53
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6457596 0.99 LMNA (0.46) LMNAKDM4ESMN1; SMN2RXFP1TP53
SCHEMBL6463804 0.94 KDM4E (0.51) LMNAKDM4ESMN1; SMN2RXFP1TP53
SCHEMBL6463808 0.94 KDM4E (0.51) LMNAKDM4ESMN1; SMN2RXFP1TP53
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6456395 0.93 KDM4E (0.50) LMNAKDM4ESMN1; SMN2RXFP1TP53
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6456402 0.93 KDM4E (0.50) LMNAKDM4ESMN1; SMN2RXFP1TP53
SCHEMBL6461557 0.92 L3MBTL1 (0.51) LMNAKDM4ESMN1; SMN2RXFP1TP53
SCHEMBL6461551 0.92 L3MBTL1 (0.51) LMNAKDM4ESMN1; SMN2RXFP1TP53
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6459414 0.91 L3MBTL1 (0.51) LMNAKDM4ESMN1; SMN2RXFP1TP53

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050197350-A1 Novel quinoline, tetrahydroquinazoline, and pyrimidine derivatives and methods of treatment related to the use thereof TAISHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. 2005-09-08 US claimed
EP-1464335-A2 Quinoline, tetrahydroquinoline and pyrimidine derivatives as mch antagonist Taisho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (JP) 2004-10-06 EP claimed
US-20050197350-A1 Novel quinoline, tetrahydroquinazoline, and pyrimidine derivatives and methods of treatment related to the use thereof TAISHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. 2005-09-08 US disclosed
EP-1464335-A2 Quinoline, tetrahydroquinoline and pyrimidine derivatives as mch antagonist Taisho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (JP) 2004-10-06 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050197350-A1 Novel quinoline, tetrahydroquinazoline, and pyrimidine derivatives and methods of treatment related to the use thereof HCRTR2, MCHR1, MCHR2 LMNA 3391/4885KDM4E 1190/4885SMN1; SMN2 1477/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.