SCHEMBL6487231

SCHEMBL6487231

O=C(O)C(Cc1ccc(OCCn2c(=O)sc3cc(Cc4ccc(Cl)cc4)ccc32)cc1)C(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.58

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PPARG P37231 11/20 0.58
PPARA Q07869 14/20 0.53
TP53 P04637 2/20 0.48
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.48
NPC1 O15118 3/20 0.47
RAB9A P51151 3/20 0.47
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.47
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.47
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.47
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.47
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.43
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6486575 0.92 PPARG (0.65) PPARGPPARATP53NPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL6487342 0.92 PPARG (0.58) PPARGPPARATP53NPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL6490285 0.91 PPARG (0.69) PPARGPPARATP53MAPTNPC1
SCHEMBL6477724 0.90 PPARG (0.63) PPARGPPARATP53NPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL6475313 0.90 PPARG (0.62) PPARGPPARATP53NPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL6476692 0.89 PPARG (0.73) PPARGPPARATP53MAPTNPC1
SCHEMBL6488809 0.88 PPARG (0.62) PPARGPPARATP53NPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL6477576 0.87 PPARG (0.59) PPARGPPARATP53NPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL6477333 0.84 PPARG (0.78) PPARGPPARATP53NPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL6488497 0.83 PPARG (0.68) PPARGPPARATP53MAPTNPC1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1252150-B1 HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES, PREPARATION METHOD AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SAME SERVIER LAB (FR) 2003-06-04 EP claimed
EP-1252150-A1 NOVEL HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES, PREPARATION METHOD AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SAME Les Laboratoires Servier (FR) 2002-10-30 EP claimed
WO-2001057002-A1 NOVEL HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES, PREPARATION METHOD AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SAME LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2001-08-09 WO claimed
US-6919362-B2 Heterocyclic derivatives, preparation method and pharmaceutical compositions containing same LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2005-07-19 US disclosed
EP-1252150-B1 HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES, PREPARATION METHOD AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SAME SERVIER LAB (FR) 2003-06-04 EP disclosed
US-20030040533-A1 Novel heterocyclic derivatives, preparation method and pharmaceutical compositions containing same LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2003-02-27 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030040533-A1 Novel heterocyclic derivatives, preparation method and pharmaceutical compositions containing same CYP2F1, CYP11B2, CYP4B1 PPARG 414/4885PPARA 845/4885TP53 3596/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.