SCHEMBL6487342

SCHEMBL6487342

O=C(O)C(Cc1ccc(OCCn2c(=O)sc3cc(Cc4cccc(Cl)c4)ccc32)cc1)C(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.58

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PPARG P37231 10/20 0.58
PPARA Q07869 13/20 0.51
NPC1 O15118 4/20 0.47
RAB9A P51151 4/20 0.47
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 4/20 0.47
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.47
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.47
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.47
LTA4H P09960 1/20 0.45
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.44
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.44
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.44

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6487231 0.92 PPARG (0.58) PPARGPPARANPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6486575 0.92 PPARG (0.65) PPARGPPARANPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6488497 0.91 PPARG (0.68) PPARGPPARANPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6476028 0.88 PPARG (0.73) PPARGPPARANPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6488809 0.87 PPARG (0.62) PPARGPPARANPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6475313 0.87 PPARG (0.62) PPARGPPARANPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6477576 0.86 PPARG (0.59) PPARGPPARANPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6477724 0.86 PPARG (0.63) PPARGPPARANPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL5913791 0.84 PPARG (0.64) PPARGPPARANPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6450965 0.84 PPARG (0.64) PPARGPPARANPC1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1252150-B1 HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES, PREPARATION METHOD AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SAME SERVIER LAB (FR) 2003-06-04 EP claimed
EP-1252150-A1 NOVEL HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES, PREPARATION METHOD AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SAME Les Laboratoires Servier (FR) 2002-10-30 EP claimed
WO-2001057002-A1 NOVEL HETEROCYCLIC DERIVATIVES, PREPARATION METHOD AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING SAME LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2001-08-09 WO claimed
US-6919362-B2 Heterocyclic derivatives, preparation method and pharmaceutical compositions containing same LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2005-07-19 US disclosed
US-20030040533-A1 Novel heterocyclic derivatives, preparation method and pharmaceutical compositions containing same LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2003-02-27 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030040533-A1 Novel heterocyclic derivatives, preparation method and pharmaceutical compositions containing same CYP2F1, CYP11B2, CYP4B1 PPARG 414/4885PPARA 845/4885NPC1 1716/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.