SCHEMBL651264

SCHEMBL651264

O=S(=O)(NC1Cc2cc(Cl)ccc2N(Cc2ccccc2)C1)c1ccc(-c2ccccn2)s1

nearest known ligand 0.48

Predicted protein targets (top 15)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
F10 P00742 1/20 0.48
GHSR Q92847 10/20 0.42
CAPN1 P07384 1/20 0.42
CNKSR1 Q969H4 1/20 0.41
FNTA P49354 1/20 0.41
FNTB P49356 1/20 0.41
PFKFB3 Q16875 1/20 0.40
MLNR O43193 1/20 0.39
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.39
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.39
DRD3 P35462 1/20 0.39
HTR6 P50406 1/20 0.39
MMP8 P22894 2/20 0.39
MMP3 P08254 1/20 0.39
MMP13 P45452 1/20 0.37

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL652675 0.84 HPGD (0.43) FNTAFNTBHTR6
SCHEMBL650932 0.84 FNTA (0.42) F10GHSRFNTAFNTBPFKFB3
SCHEMBL651614 0.83 FNTA (0.42) F10FNTAFNTBHTR6
SCHEMBL650107 0.81 ALDH1A1 (0.46) FNTAFNTBHTR6
SCHEMBL652456 0.80 FNTA (0.43) F10FNTAFNTBHTR6MMP8
SCHEMBL651258 0.80 FNTA (0.55) F10FNTAFNTB
SCHEMBL651558 0.79 FNTA (0.49) F10FNTAFNTB
SCHEMBL651390 0.78 FNTA (0.49) F10FNTAFNTB
SCHEMBL653030 0.76 FNTA (0.46) F10FNTAFNTB
SCHEMBL651552 0.76 MTNR1A (0.51) FNTAFNTB

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8119808-B2 Tetrahydroquinoline derivatives as cannabinoid receptor modulators BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY (US) 2012-02-21 US claimed
US-20110104315-A1 TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS CANNABINOID RECEPTOR MODULATORS BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY 2011-05-05 US claimed
US-20050014786-A1 Tetrahydroquinoline derivatives as cannabinoid receptor modulators BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY 2005-01-20 US claimed
US-8119808-B2 Tetrahydroquinoline derivatives as cannabinoid receptor modulators BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY (US) 2012-02-21 US disclosed
US-20110104315-A1 TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS CANNABINOID RECEPTOR MODULATORS BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY 2011-05-05 US disclosed
US-20050014786-A1 Tetrahydroquinoline derivatives as cannabinoid receptor modulators BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY 2005-01-20 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110104315-A1 TETRAHYDROQUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AS CANNABINOID RECEPTOR MODULATORS CNR2, CNR1, OPRL1 F10 3174/4885GHSR 1061/4885CAPN1 3783/4885
US-20050014786-A1 Tetrahydroquinoline derivatives as cannabinoid receptor modulators CNR2, CNR1, OPRL1 F10 3174/4885GHSR 1061/4885CAPN1 3783/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.