SCHEMBL6595208

SCHEMBL6595208

CC(=O)Nc1ccc(C)c(CCN2CCC(c3c[nH]c4ccc(F)cc34)CC2)c1

nearest known ligand 0.61

Predicted protein targets (top 6)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HTR1D P28221 16/20 0.61
HTR1B P28222 13/20 0.61
HTR1A P08908 2/20 0.61
HTR1F P30939 2/20 0.61
CHRM2 P08172 1/20 0.59
DRD2 P14416 1/20 0.59

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6596015 0.92 HTR1D (0.63) HTR1DHTR1BHTR1AHTR1FCHRM2
SCHEMBL6598083 0.92 HTR1D (0.59) HTR1DHTR1BHTR1AHTR1FCHRM2
SCHEMBL6595427 0.92 HTR1D (0.59) HTR1DHTR1BHTR1AHTR1FCHRM2
SCHEMBL6595304 0.91 HTR1D (0.59) HTR1DHTR1BHTR1AHTR1FCHRM2
SCHEMBL6597296 0.91 HTR1D (0.76) HTR1DHTR1BHTR1AHTR1FCHRM2
SCHEMBL6598851 0.90 HTR1D (0.58) HTR1DHTR1BHTR1AHTR1FCHRM2
SCHEMBL6597926 0.89 HTR1D (0.71) HTR1DHTR1BHTR1AHTR1FCHRM2
SCHEMBL6595451 0.89 HTR1D (0.58) HTR1DHTR1BHTR1AHTR1FCHRM2
SCHEMBL6598060 0.88 HTR1D (0.55) HTR1DHTR1BHTR1AHTR1FCHRM2
SCHEMBL6598475 0.88 HTR1D (0.60) HTR1DHTR1BCHRM2DRD2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 10 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-6743809-B2 Indole Derivatives useful for the treatment of CNS disorders H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2004-06-01 US claimed
EP-1305307-B1 INDOLE DERIVATIVES USEFUL FOR THE TREATMENT OF CNS DISORDERS LUNDBECK & CO AS H (DK) 2004-05-06 EP claimed
US-20030166664-A1 Indole derivatives useful for the treatment of CNS disorders H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2003-09-04 US claimed
EP-1305307-A1 INDOLE DERIVATIVES USEFUL FOR THE TREATMENT OF CNS DISORDERS H. Lundbeck A/S (DK) 2003-05-02 EP claimed
WO-2002008223-A1 INDOLE DERIVATIVES USEFUL FOR THE TREATMENT OF CNS DISORDERS H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2002-01-31 WO claimed
US-6743809-B2 Indole Derivatives useful for the treatment of CNS disorders H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2004-06-01 US disclosed
EP-1305307-B1 INDOLE DERIVATIVES USEFUL FOR THE TREATMENT OF CNS DISORDERS LUNDBECK & CO AS H (DK) 2004-05-06 EP disclosed
US-20030166664-A1 Indole derivatives useful for the treatment of CNS disorders H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2003-09-04 US disclosed
EP-1305307-A1 INDOLE DERIVATIVES USEFUL FOR THE TREATMENT OF CNS DISORDERS H. Lundbeck A/S (DK) 2003-05-02 EP disclosed
WO-2002008223-A1 INDOLE DERIVATIVES USEFUL FOR THE TREATMENT OF CNS DISORDERS H. LUNDBECK A/S (DK) 2002-01-31 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030166664-A1 Indole derivatives useful for the treatment of CNS disorders DRD2, DRD3, CNR1 HTR1D 7/4885HTR1B 18/4885HTR1A 10/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.