SCHEMBL6712007

SCHEMBL6712007

CC(C)Oc1ccc(-c2ccc3c(c2)CC2CCNCCN32)c(C(F)(F)F)c1

nearest known ligand 0.53

Predicted protein targets (top 5)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HTR2C P28335 17/20 0.53
HTR2A P28223 14/20 0.44
HTR2B P41595 4/20 0.41
FFAR4 Q5NUL3 1/20 0.36
HTR6 P50406 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6718842 0.93 HTR2C (0.53) HTR2CHTR2AHTR2BFFAR4HTR6
SCHEMBL6711204 0.90 HTR2C (0.56) HTR2CHTR2AHTR2BHTR6
SCHEMBL6719060 0.86 HTR2C (0.56) HTR2CHTR2AHTR2BFFAR4
SCHEMBL6713881 0.83 HTR2C (0.57) HTR2CHTR2AHTR2BHTR6
SCHEMBL6714299 0.82 HTR2C (0.53) HTR2CHTR2AHTR2BHTR6
SCHEMBL6714062 0.82 HTR2C (0.56) HTR2CHTR2AHTR2BHTR6
SCHEMBL6711430 0.81 HTR2C (0.68) HTR2CHTR2AHTR2B
SCHEMBL6714338 0.81 HTR2C (0.64) HTR2CHTR2AHTR2BHTR6
SCHEMBL6716148 0.81 HTR2C (0.52) HTR2CHTR2AHTR2BHTR6
SCHEMBL6712453 0.78 HTR2C (0.53) HTR2CHTR2AHTR2BFFAR4

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20040209870-A1 Novel 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-[1,4]diazepino[1,7-a]indole compounds ENNIS MICHAEL DALTON (US) 2004-10-21 US claimed
US-6734301-B2 5-HT LIGANDS USED TO TREAT CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISORDERS PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY 2004-05-11 US claimed
EP-1328525-A2 2,3,4,5-TETRAHYDRO-1H-[1,4]DIAZEPINO[1,7-A]INDOLE COMPOUNDS PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY (US) 2003-07-23 EP claimed
US-20020002161-A1 Novel 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-[1,4]diazepino[1,7-a]indole compounds PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY 2002-01-03 US claimed
WO-2001072752-A2 2,3,4,5-TETRAHYDRO-1H-[1,4]DIAZEPINO[1,7-a]INDOLE COMPOUNDS PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY (US) 2001-10-04 WO claimed
US-20040209870-A1 Novel 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-[1,4]diazepino[1,7-a]indole compounds ENNIS MICHAEL DALTON (US) 2004-10-21 US disclosed
US-6734301-B2 5-HT LIGANDS USED TO TREAT CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISORDERS PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY 2004-05-11 US disclosed
US-20020002161-A1 Novel 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-[1,4]diazepino[1,7-a]indole compounds PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY 2002-01-03 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20020002161-A1 Novel 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-[1,4]diazepino[1,7-a]indole compounds HTR1D, HTR1A, HTR1E HTR2C 7/4885HTR2A 18/4885HTR2B 15/4885
US-20040209870-A1 Novel 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-[1,4]diazepino[1,7-a]indole compounds HCRTR2, NR2C2, RCOR3 HTR2C 553/4885HTR2A 1403/4885HTR2B 692/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.