Predicted protein targets (top 8)
| gene | UniProt | supporting neighbours | confidence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ | PPARG | P37231 | 2/20 | 0.73 |
| ▸ | GPR132 | Q9UNW8 | 1/20 | 0.73 |
| ▸ | FAAH | O00519 | 1/20 | 0.66 |
| ▸ | MEN1 | O00255 | 1/20 | 0.56 |
| ▸ | KMT2A | Q03164 | 1/20 | 0.56 |
| ▸ | LTB4R2 | Q9NPC1 | 1/20 | 0.55 |
| ▸ | ALOX5 | P09917 | 1/20 | 0.55 |
| ▸ | MAPT | P10636 | 1/20 | 0.55 |
Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.
Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules
Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.
| Compound | similarity | top predicted | shared targets | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHEMBL676737 | 1.00 | PPARG (0.73) | PPARGGPR132FAAHMEN1KMT2A | |
| SCHEMBL31359284 | 1.00 | PPARG (0.73) | PPARGGPR132FAAHMEN1KMT2A | |
| SCHEMBL677201 | 1.00 | PPARG (0.73) | PPARGGPR132FAAHMEN1KMT2A | |
| SCHEMBL18045215 | 1.00 | PPARG (0.73) | PPARGGPR132FAAHMEN1KMT2A | |
| SCHEMBL6288019 | 1.00 | PPARG (0.73) | PPARGGPR132FAAHMEN1KMT2A | |
| SCHEMBL13443444 | 0.95 | PPARG (0.65) | PPARGGPR132FAAHLTB4R2ALOX5 | |
| SCHEMBL10027752 | 0.95 | PPARG (0.65) | PPARGGPR132FAAHLTB4R2ALOX5 | |
| SCHEMBL29536611 | 0.90 | PPARG (0.58) | PPARGGPR132FAAHMEN1KMT2A | |
| SCHEMBL19181457 | 0.89 | PPARG (0.73) | PPARGGPR132FAAHMEN1KMT2A | |
| SCHEMBL22625520 | 0.89 | PPARG (0.57) | PPARGGPR132FAAHMEN1KMT2A |
Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.
Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them
Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.
| Patent | Title | Assignee | Published | Priority | Filing | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US-20160264979-A1 | Methods for Controlling Flower Development in Plants | UNIV YALE (US) | 2016-09-15 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-9258998-B2 | Methods for controlling flower development in plants | YALE UNIVERSITY (US) | 2016-02-16 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-20120010077-A1 | Methods for Controlling Flower Development in Plants | YALE UNIVERSITY | 2012-01-12 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| WO-2010081005-A1 | METHOD FOR CONTROLLING FLOWER DEVELOPMENT IN PLANTS | YALE UNIVERSITY (US) | 2010-07-15 | — | — | WO | disclosed |
Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?
For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.
| Patent | Title | Text reads most about | Predicted target · text-rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| US-20160264979-A1 | Methods for Controlling Flower Development in Plants | CYP17A1, STOM, ERG28 | PPARG 1536/4885GPR132 4421/4885FAAH 460/4885 |
| US-20120010077-A1 | Methods for Controlling Flower Development in Plants | CYP17A1, STOM, ERG28 | PPARG 1536/4885GPR132 4421/4885FAAH 460/4885 |
“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.