SCHEMBL6986786

SCHEMBL6986786

CC(C)(C)[Si](C)(C)OC(CN)CN1CCC(Cc2ccccc2)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
GRIN2D O15399 4/20 0.51
GRIN3B O60391 4/20 0.51
ADRA1D P25100 4/20 0.51
ADRA1A P35348 4/20 0.51
ADRA1B P35368 4/20 0.51
GRIN1 Q05586 4/20 0.51
GRIN2A Q12879 4/20 0.51
GRIN2B Q13224 4/20 0.51
GRIN2C Q14957 4/20 0.51
GRIN3A Q8TCU5 4/20 0.51
HTR1A P08908 1/20 0.50
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.49
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.49
CARM1 Q86X55 2/20 0.49
PRMT6 Q96LA8 2/20 0.49
PRMT3 O60678 1/20 0.49
PRMT1 Q99873 1/20 0.49
PRMT8 Q9NR22 1/20 0.49
DRD4 P21917 3/20 0.47
CCR3 P51677 2/20 0.46

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6993151 0.89 GRIN2B (0.46) GRIN2DGRIN3BADRA1DADRA1AADRA1B
SCHEMBL6998498 0.84 MEN1 (0.51) GRIN2DGRIN3BADRA1DADRA1AADRA1B
SCHEMBL6991291 0.81 MEN1 (0.49) GRIN2DGRIN3BADRA1DADRA1AADRA1B
SCHEMBL6989963 0.79 GRIN2D (0.47) GRIN2DGRIN3BADRA1DADRA1AADRA1B
SCHEMBL6997026 0.75 MEN1 (0.46) GRIN2DGRIN3BADRA1DADRA1AADRA1B
SCHEMBL25866860 0.74 MEN1 (0.31) MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL25865575 0.73 MEN1 (0.33) MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL26668860 0.73 CARM1 (0.44) MEN1KMT2ACARM1
SCHEMBL31441281 0.73 CARM1 (0.44) MEN1KMT2ACARM1
SCHEMBL6986594 0.72 CARM1 (0.69) GRIN2DGRIN3BADRA1DADRA1AADRA1B

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-6642256-B2 Brain disorders, psychological disorders, antiischemic agents, central nervous system disorders WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC 2003-11-04 US disclosed
EP-1345935-A2 PIPERIDINE DERIVATIVES AS SUBTYPE SELECTIVE N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE ANTAGONISTS Warner-Lambert Company LLC (US) 2003-09-24 EP disclosed
US-20030018021-A1 Piperidine derivatives as subtype selective N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists KORNBERG BRIAN EDWARD (US) 2003-01-23 US disclosed
WO-2002050070-A2 PIPERIDINE DERIVATIVES AS SUBTYPE SELECTIVE N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE ANTAGONISTS WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC (US) 2002-06-27 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030018021-A1 Piperidine derivatives as subtype selective N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists GRIN1, OPRD1, OPRM1 GRIN2D 9/4885GRIN3B 10/4885ADRA1D 173/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.