SCHEMBL7073564

SCHEMBL7073564

NS(=O)(=O)c1cc(Nc2ccc(I)cc2)c(-c2nnc(O)s2)cc1F

nearest known ligand 0.37

Predicted protein targets (top 15)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SOS1 Q07889 3/20 0.37
CA1 P00915 7/20 0.32
CA2 P00918 7/20 0.32
CA9 Q16790 6/20 0.32
CA12 O43570 4/20 0.32
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.31
TET2 Q6N021 1/20 0.31
CA4 P22748 2/20 0.31
CA6 P23280 1/20 0.31
CA7 P43166 1/20 0.31
CA13 Q8N1Q1 1/20 0.31
CA14 Q9ULX7 1/20 0.31
ILK Q13418 1/20 0.31
CDK1 P06493 1/20 0.30
CDK2 P24941 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6138172 0.96 SOS1 (0.37) SOS1CA1CA2CA9CA12
SCHEMBL6137926 0.84 KDM4E (0.39) SOS1CA1CA2CA9CA12
SCHEMBL6137788 0.82 CA2 (0.38) CA1CA2CA9CA12CA6
SCHEMBL6138079 0.82 IDO1 (0.35) CA1CA2CA9CA12ILK
SCHEMBL6137955 0.79 SOS1 (0.37) SOS1CA1CA2CA9CA12
SCHEMBL6138227 0.79 SOS1 (0.37) SOS1CA1CA2CA9CA12
SCHEMBL6138034 0.77 ILK (0.37) SOS1CA1CA2CA9CA12
SCHEMBL6137709 0.75 SOS1 (0.38) SOS1CA1CA2LMNATET2
SCHEMBL6138001 0.75 CA1 (0.40) SOS1CA1CA2CA9CA12
SCHEMBL6137930 0.75 MGAM (0.34) CA1CA2CA9CA12LMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 9 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
CN-1149204-C 1-heterocyclic substituted diarylamines ��ʲ 2004-05-12 CN disclosed
US-6545030-B1 Treating proliferative diseases, the sequelae of a stroke or heart failure, xenograft rejection, osteoarthritis, HIV, rheumatoid arthritis, cystic fibrosis, hepatomegaly, shock,cardiomegaly, Alzheimer's disease, diabetes WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY 2003-04-08 US disclosed
US-20030004193-A1 1-Heterocycle substituted diarylamines BARRETT STEPHEN DOUGLAS (US) 2003-01-02 US disclosed
CN-1358095-A Methods of treating chronic pain using MEK inhibitors WARNER LAMBERT CO (US) 2002-07-10 CN disclosed
EP-1202732-A2 METHOD FOR TREATING CHRONIC PAIN USING MEK INHIBITORS WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY LLC (US) 2002-05-08 EP disclosed
CN-1334807-A 1-heterocycle substd. diarylamines WARNER LAMBERT CO (US) 2002-02-06 CN disclosed
EP-1144394-A1 1-HETEROCYCLE SUBSTITUTED DIARYLAMINES WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY (US) 2001-10-17 EP disclosed
WO-2001005391-A2 METHOD FOR TREATING CHRONIC PAIN USING MEK INHIBITORS WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY (US) 2001-01-25 WO disclosed
WO-2000042029-A1 1-HETEROCYCLE SUBSTITUTED DIARYLAMINES WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY (US) 2000-07-20 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030004193-A1 1-Heterocycle substituted diarylamines IDH3A, CCNA1, HCCS SOS1 443/4885CA1 842/4885CA2 3273/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.