SCHEMBL7133459

SCHEMBL7133459

CCc1ccc(CN2CCN(C(=O)c3cccc4c3C(S(=O)(=O)c3ccccc3)CS4(O)O)CC2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.48

Predicted protein targets (top 13)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 7/20 0.48
ALDH1A1 P00352 5/20 0.48
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 5/20 0.48
HTT P42858 2/20 0.48
GAA P10253 1/20 0.48
TSHR P16473 2/20 0.45
KDM4E B2RXH2 3/20 0.44
MEN1 O00255 3/20 0.43
KMT2A Q03164 3/20 0.43
FAAH O00519 1/20 0.43
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.42
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.42
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7155908 0.99 LMNA (0.47) LMNAALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2HTTGAA
SCHEMBL7134761 0.94 LMNA (0.51) LMNAALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2HTTTSHR
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7130689 0.93 LMNA (0.50) LMNAALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2HTTTSHR
SCHEMBL7134799 0.92 LMNA (0.45) LMNAALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2HTTTSHR
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7699759 0.91 LMNA (0.45) LMNAALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2HTTTSHR
SCHEMBL7133461 0.91 LMNA (0.48) LMNAALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2HTTGAA
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7155905 0.90 LMNA (0.47) LMNAALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2HTTGAA
SCHEMBL7694864 0.85 NR1H4 (0.56) LMNAALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2HTTKDM4E
SCHEMBL7134764 0.84 LMNA (0.51) LMNAALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2HTTTSHR
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7173507 0.84 NR1H4 (0.56) LMNAALDH1A1SMN1; SMN2HTTKDM4E

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20030073706-A1 Fused thiophone derivatives and drugs containing the same as the active ingredient KONISHI MIKIO (JP) 2003-04-17 US claimed
US-6420391-B1 PREVENTION AND/OR TREATMENT OF VARIOUS INFLAMMATORY DISEASES, SEPSIS, MULTIPLE MYELOMA, PLASMA CELL LEUKEMIA, OSTEOPOROSIS, CACHEXIA, PSORIASIS, NEPHRITIS, RENAL CELL CARCINOMA, KAPOSI'S SARCOMA, RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS, GAMMOPATHY, CASTLEMAN'S ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. (JP) 2002-07-16 US claimed
EP-1067128-A1 FUSED THIOPHENE DERIVATIVES AND DRUGS CONTAINING THE SAME AS THE ACTIVE INGREDIENT ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. (JP) 2001-01-10 EP claimed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030073706-A1 Fused thiophone derivatives and drugs containing the same as the active ingredient TPMT, CD47, THPO LMNA 2985/4885ALDH1A1 3159/4885SMN1; SMN2 527/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.