SCHEMBL7187666

SCHEMBL7187666

COc1cc(Cn2cncc2CO)ccc1C#N

nearest known ligand 0.60

Predicted protein targets (top 6)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ CYP11B1 P15538 6/20 0.60
▸ CYP11B2 P19099 6/20 0.60
▸ FNTA P49354 10/20 0.47
▸ FNTB P49356 10/20 0.47
▸ PGGT1B P53609 10/20 0.47
▸ CACNA1H O95180 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL7658010 0.91 CYP11B1 (0.53) CYP11B1CYP11B2FNTAFNTBPGGT1B
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL2789879 0.85 CYP11B1 (0.47) CYP11B1CYP11B2FNTAFNTBPGGT1B
SCHEMBL7194363 0.85 CYP11B1 (0.57) CYP11B1CYP11B2FNTAFNTBPGGT1B
Bromide SCHEMBL8005944 0.84 CYP11B1 (0.56) CYP11B1CYP11B2FNTAFNTBPGGT1B
SCHEMBL3501417 0.82 FNTA (0.62) CYP11B1CYP11B2FNTAFNTBPGGT1B
SCHEMBL6433915 0.81 CYP11B1 (0.64) CYP11B1CYP11B2CACNA1H
SCHEMBL7658006 0.81 FNTA (0.47) CYP11B1CYP11B2FNTAFNTBPGGT1B
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7980481 0.81 FNTA (0.61) CYP11B1CYP11B2FNTAFNTBPGGT1B
SCHEMBL7187767 0.80 CYP11B1 (0.60) CYP11B1CYP11B2FNTAFNTBPGGT1B
SCHEMBL7585827 0.77 CYP11B1 (0.55) CYP11B1CYP11B2FNTAFNTBPGGT1B

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20030220241-A1 Method of treating cancer DEFEO-JONES DEBORAH (US) 2003-11-27 — — US disclosed
EP-1019529-A4 A METHOD OF TREATING CANCER MERCK & CO INC (US) 2002-09-11 — — EP disclosed
WO-2000059930-A1 A METHOD OF TREATING CANCER MERCK & CO., INC. (US) 2000-10-12 — — WO disclosed
US-6103487-A DETECTING MODULATORS THAT SUPPRESS THE ACTIVITY OF A TRANSFERASES; ANTICARCINOGENIC AGENTS MERCK & CO., INC. (US) 2000-08-15 — — US disclosed
EP-1019529-A1 A METHOD OF TREATING CANCER Merck & Co., Inc. (US) 2000-07-19 — — EP disclosed
WO-2000025789-A1 A METHOD OF TREATING ENDOMETRIOSIS MERCK & CO., INC. (US) 2000-05-11 — — WO disclosed
WO-2000016626-A1 A METHOD OF TREATING CANCER MERCK & CO., INC. (US) 2000-03-30 — — WO disclosed
WO-1999010525-A1 A METHOD OF TREATING CANCER MERCK & CO., INC. (US) 1999-03-04 — — WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030220241-A1 Method of treating cancer ACP3, PSAT1, LCAT CYP11B1 530/4885CYP11B2 621/4885FNTA 4/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback