SCHEMBL7203815

SCHEMBL7203815

COC(=O)[C@@](C)(N)CCCN

nearest known ligand 0.38

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ODC1 P11926 2/20 0.38
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.36
BLM P54132 2/20 0.36
ARG1 P05089 1/20 0.36
ARG2 P78540 1/20 0.36
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.36
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.36
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.36
PMP22 Q01453 1/20 0.36
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.36
DGAT1 O75907 1/20 0.34
FDPS P14324 1/20 0.33
PDE3A Q14432 1/20 0.33
PAOX Q6QHF9 3/20 0.32
CYP1A2 P05177 2/20 0.32
GGT1 P19440 1/20 0.31
TSHR P16473 2/20 0.30
GABRR3 A8MPY1 1/20 0.30
GABRP O00591 1/20 0.30
GABRD O14764 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6595080 1.00 ODC1 (0.38) ODC1LMNABLMARG1ARG2
SCHEMBL7203818 1.00 ODC1 (0.38) ODC1LMNABLMARG1ARG2
Ammonia Solution, Strong SCHEMBL27694659 0.98 ODC1 (0.37) ODC1LMNABLMARG1ARG2
SCHEMBL31325597 0.94 ARG1 (0.39) ODC1LMNABLMARG1ARG2
SCHEMBL17138101 0.83 FDPS (0.41) LMNAARG1ARG2MAPTDGAT1
SCHEMBL22854370 0.83 FDPS (0.41) LMNAARG1ARG2MAPTDGAT1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL29099886 0.82 FDPS (0.39) LMNAARG1ARG2MAPTDGAT1
SCHEMBL12138662 0.82 CYP4A11 (0.46) ARG1ARG2DGAT1GGT1THRB
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL29099884 0.82 FDPS (0.39) LMNAARG1ARG2MAPTDGAT1
SCHEMBL13689469 0.81 CYP4F2 (0.40) ODC1LMNABLMKDM4EMAPT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-6602910-B2 Treating cancer in a patient comprising administering an effective amount of substantially purified D enantiomer of difluoromethylornithine ILEX ONCOLOGY, INC. 2003-08-05 US disclosed
US-20020045663-A1 D-enantiomer of DFMO and methods of use therefor ILEX ONCOLOGY, INC. (US) 2002-04-18 US disclosed
US-4590211-A USING HYDROXYUREA PRODURG FOR SKIN DISORDERS THE UPJOHN COMPANY (US) 1986-05-20 US disclosed
US-4302457-A ACTIVATION OF PRO-DRUGS BY ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION IN TREATMENT OF SKIN DISORDERS THE UPJOHN COMPANY (US) 1981-11-24 US disclosed
US-4302456-A UV RADIATION ACTIVATION OF PRO-DRUG, FOR SKIN DISEASE THE UPJOHN COMPANY (US) 1981-11-24 US disclosed
US-4235887-A ADMINISTERING PRO-DRUG STEROID FOR SKIN DISORDERS THE UPJOHN COMPANY (US) 1980-11-25 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20020045663-A1 D-enantiomer of DFMO and methods of use therefor DHODH, DDT, HADHB ODC1 34/4885LMNA 3450/4885BLM 1907/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.