Acetochlor

Acetochlor

SCHEMBL7588205

C=CCN(CC=C)C(=O)C(Cl)Cl.CCOCN(C(=O)CCl)c1c(C)cccc1CC.Nc1c([N+](=O)[O-])ccc(Oc2ccccc2)c1Cl.O=C(O)CNCP(=O)(O)O

nearest known ligand 0.40

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TDP1 Q9NUW8 3/20 0.40
TP53 P04637 2/20 0.40
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.40
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.40
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.36
TTR P02766 1/20 0.36
ALB P02768 1/20 0.36
THRB P10828 1/20 0.36
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.36
POLB P06746 1/20 0.31
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Acetochlor SCHEMBL7580716 0.95 TDP1 (0.38) TDP1TP53ALDH1A1CYP3A4MEN1
Alachlor SCHEMBL7580613 0.92 MEN1 (0.38) TDP1TP53MEN1TTRALB
Acetochlor SCHEMBL7586034 0.92 TDP1 (0.47) TDP1TP53ALDH1A1CYP3A4MEN1
Acetochlor SCHEMBL7575647 0.91 TDP1 (0.47) TDP1TP53ALDH1A1CYP3A4MEN1
Metolachor SCHEMBL7585170 0.89 MEN1 (0.35) TDP1ALDH1A1MEN1TTRALB
Acetochlor SCHEMBL7579676 0.87 TDP1 (0.39) TDP1TP53ALDH1A1CYP3A4MEN1
Acetochlor SCHEMBL7582799 0.86 TDP1 (0.45) TDP1TP53ALDH1A1CYP3A4MEN1
Bifenox SCHEMBL7581753 0.85 TDP1 (0.43) TDP1TP53ALDH1A1CYP3A4
Metolachor SCHEMBL7578976 0.84 MEN1 (0.34) TDP1ALDH1A1MEN1TTRALB
Oxyfluorfen SCHEMBL7578817 0.83 TDP1 (0.36) TDP1TP53ALDH1A1CYP3A4MEN1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20020004457-A1 Herbicidal composition SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) 2002-01-10 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20020004457-A1 Herbicidal composition PPOX, ALAD, DDT TDP1 1969/4885TP53 4303/4885ALDH1A1 812/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.