SCHEMBL9975609

SCHEMBL9975609

CCNC(=O)c1ccc(N(C)c2csc(-c3ccccc3)n2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.48

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HPGD P15428 6/20 0.48
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 5/20 0.48
NPC1 O15118 5/20 0.48
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.48
RAB9A P51151 4/20 0.48
KDM4E B2RXH2 3/20 0.48
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.46
HDAC1 Q13547 1/20 0.42
HDAC8 Q9BY41 1/20 0.42
HDAC6 Q9UBN7 1/20 0.42
POLB P06746 1/20 0.42
AGTR1 P30556 1/20 0.42
HTT P42858 1/20 0.42
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.42
CYP1A2 P05177 2/20 0.42
CYP2C9 P11712 2/20 0.42
CYP2C19 P33261 2/20 0.42
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.42
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.42
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL9975606 0.83 SMN1; SMN2 (0.47) HPGDSMN1; SMN2NPC1MAPTRAB9A
SCHEMBL8238620 0.82 RARA (0.54) HPGDSMN1; SMN2NPC1MAPTRAB9A
SCHEMBL9975611 0.78 SREBF2 (0.46) HPGDSMN1; SMN2NPC1MAPTRAB9A
SCHEMBL9975607 0.78 CNR2 (0.42) HPGDSMN1; SMN2NPC1MAPTRAB9A
SCHEMBL8239215 0.76 HPGD (0.51) HPGDSMN1; SMN2NPC1RAB9AALDH1A1
SCHEMBL9975610 0.76 SREBF2 (0.56) HPGDSMN1; SMN2NPC1MAPTRAB9A
SCHEMBL12789158 0.75 HPGD (0.69) HPGDSMN1; SMN2NPC1MAPTRAB9A
SCHEMBL8239699 0.75 MAPT (0.46) HPGDSMN1; SMN2NPC1MAPTRAB9A
SCHEMBL8233212 0.74 HPGD (0.50) HPGDSMN1; SMN2NPC1RAB9AALDH1A1
SCHEMBL9975602 0.73 MAPT (0.49) HPGDSMN1; SMN2NPC1MAPTRAB9A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8394798-B2 Compositions and methods for inducing neuronal differentiation THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE (US) 2013-03-12 US disclosed
US-20120157457-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INDUCING NEURONAL DIFFERENTIATION THE SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES (US) 2012-06-21 US disclosed
US-20120157457-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INDUCING NEURONAL DIFFERENTIATION THE SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES (US) 2012-06-21 US disclosed
US-8105581-B2 Compositions and methods for inducing neuronal differentiation THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE (US) 2012-01-31 US disclosed
US-20100166710-A1 Compositions and Methods for Inducing Neuronal Differentiation THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE (US) 2010-07-01 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100166710-A1 Compositions and Methods for Inducing Neuronal Differentiation CHAT, DCX, GAP43 HPGD 2075/4885SMN1; SMN2 115/4885NPC1 1361/4885
US-20120157457-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INDUCING NEURONAL DIFFERENTIATION CHAT, DCX, GAP43 HPGD 2075/4885SMN1; SMN2 115/4885NPC1 1361/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.