SCHEMBL10001255

SCHEMBL10001255

COc1cc2c(cc1OC)C1(CC2(C)C)CC(C)(C)c2cc3c(cc21)Oc1cc(O)c(O)cc1O3

nearest known ligand 0.40

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
FTO Q9C0B1 2/20 0.40
ALOX15 P16050 4/20 0.32
ALOX12 P18054 2/20 0.32
RXRA P19793 2/20 0.32
MAOB P27338 1/20 0.32
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.31
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.31
BCHE P06276 1/20 0.30
CYP3A4 P08684 2/20 0.30
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.30
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.30
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.30
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.30
EHMT2 Q96KQ7 2/20 0.30
NFKB1 P19838 1/20 0.30
NFKB2 Q00653 1/20 0.30
RELA Q04206 1/20 0.30
P4HB P07237 1/20 0.30
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.30
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL19398980 0.88 FTO (0.39) FTO
SCHEMBL13250932 0.87 FTO (0.33) FTORXRAALDH1A1MAPK1EHMT2
SCHEMBL13979784 0.83 FTO (0.38) FTORXRAMAOBALDH1A1BCHE
SCHEMBL12110373 0.83 FTO (0.38) FTORXRAMAOBALDH1A1MAPT
SCHEMBL11136773 0.82 CA12 (0.41) FTOALOX15ALOX12RXRAALDH1A1
SCHEMBL13452900 0.81 FTO (0.32) FTOALDH1A1MAPK1
SCHEMBL4464547 0.81 FTO (0.39) FTOALOX15RXRAMAOBALDH1A1
SCHEMBL21730011 0.80 FTO (0.38) FTOALOX15ALOX12ALDH1A1MAPK1
SCHEMBL10001257 0.79 MAPKAPK2 (0.33) FTOALOX12
SCHEMBL751889 0.79 NQO2 (0.36) MAPT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8969628-B2 Method for enriching a homogeneous catalyst from a process flow EVONIK DEGUSSA GMBH (DE) 2015-03-03 US disclosed
US-20120046503-A1 METHOD FOR ENRICHING A HOMOGENEOUS CATALYST FROM A PROCESS FLOW EVONIK OXENO GMBH (DE) 2012-02-23 US disclosed
US-8056732-B2 Microporous polymer material THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER (GB) 2011-11-15 US disclosed
US-20100304112-A1 MICROPOROUS POLYMER MATERIAL THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER (GB) 2010-12-02 US disclosed
US-7690514-B2 Microporous polymer material THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER (GB) 2010-04-06 US disclosed
US-7410525-B1 Mixed matrix membranes incorporating microporous polymers as fillers UOP LLC (US) 2008-08-12 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120046503-A1 METHOD FOR ENRICHING A HOMOGENEOUS CATALYST FROM A PROCESS FLOW PARG, PHOSPHO1, COG6 FTO 229/4885ALOX15 1054/4885ALOX12 1767/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.