SCHEMBL10205463

SCHEMBL10205463

C=C(C)C(=O)OCCNC(=O)OCC(F)(F)OC

nearest known ligand 0.39

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
THRB P10828 1/20 0.39
TSHR P16473 3/20 0.38
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.36
ACHE P22303 8/20 0.33
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.31
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.31
POLB P06746 1/20 0.31
APEX1 P27695 1/20 0.31
HTT P42858 1/20 0.31
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.31
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL10902664 0.88 THRB (0.41) THRBTSHRALDH1A1ACHELMNA
SCHEMBL14330808 0.87 THRB (0.40) THRBTSHRALDH1A1ACHELMNA
SCHEMBL85834 0.87 THRB (0.40) THRBTSHRALDH1A1ACHELMNA
SCHEMBL17750747 0.86 THRB (0.37) THRBTSHRALDH1A1ACHELMNA
SCHEMBL14551152 0.85 THRB (0.36) THRBTSHRALDH1A1ACHE
SCHEMBL1755340 0.85 THRB (0.36) THRBTSHRALDH1A1ACHE
SCHEMBL15292840 0.84 THRB (0.38) THRBTSHRALDH1A1ACHELMNA
SCHEMBL12021040 0.83 THRB (0.36) THRBTSHRACHE
SCHEMBL15242153 0.83 THRB (0.36) THRBTSHRACHE
SCHEMBL6253284 0.83 THRB (0.42) THRBTSHRALDH1A1ACHELMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-9662809-B2 Methods and materials for fabricating laminate nanomolds and nanoparticles therefrom LIQUIDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (US) 2017-05-30 US disclosed
US-20160236379-A1 Methods and Materials for Fabricating Laminate Nanomolds and Nanoparticles Therefrom LIQUIDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (US) 2016-08-18 US disclosed
US-9340001-B2 Methods and materials for fabricating laminate nanomolds and nanoparticles therefrom LIQUIDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (US) 2016-05-17 US disclosed
US-20160038418-A1 NANOPARTICLE FABRICATION METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND MATERIALS NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 2016-02-11 US disclosed
US-8439666-B2 Methods and materials for fabricating laminate nanomolds and nanoparticles therefrom LIQUIDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (US) 2013-05-14 US disclosed
US-8158728-B2 Methods and materials for fabricating microfluidic devices THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL (US) 2012-04-17 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20160038418-A1 NANOPARTICLE FABRICATION METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND MATERIALS TTN, TAGLN2, TLN1 THRB 2627/4885TSHR 840/4885ALDH1A1 1111/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.