SCHEMBL10246859

SCHEMBL10246859

Cc1cc(C(=O)NC2CCCc3cc(C(=O)NO)ccc32)cc(C(F)(F)F)c1

nearest known ligand 0.55

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.55
TAS1R3 Q7RTX0 4/20 0.48
TAS1R1 Q7RTX1 4/20 0.48
TAS1R2 Q8TE23 2/20 0.47
PDE2A O00408 2/20 0.46
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.45
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.45
DHODH Q02127 1/20 0.44
HDAC8 Q9BY41 1/20 0.44
HTT P42858 1/20 0.43
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL10258791 0.93 TAS1R3 (0.52) LMNATAS1R3TAS1R1TAS1R2PDE2A
SCHEMBL10252477 0.88 DHODH (0.54) LMNATAS1R3TAS1R1TAS1R2PDE2A
SCHEMBL10252923 0.88 HDAC8 (0.57) LMNATAS1R3TAS1R1TAS1R2PDE2A
SCHEMBL10247155 0.84 LMNA (0.77) LMNATAS1R3TAS1R1TAS1R2KMT2A
SCHEMBL10246997 0.84 LMNA (0.62) LMNATAS1R3TAS1R1TAS1R2KMT2A
SCHEMBL10246865 0.82 LMNA (0.54) LMNATAS1R3TAS1R1TAS1R2KMT2A
SCHEMBL22500096 0.81 LMNA (0.56) LMNATAS1R3TAS1R1TAS1R2PDE2A
SCHEMBL10254152 0.79 DHODH (0.56) TAS1R3TAS1R1TAS1R2PDE2ADHODH
SCHEMBL10247153 0.77 LMNA (0.50) LMNATAS1R3TAS1R1TAS1R2KMT2A
SCHEMBL10256809 0.77 CNR1 (0.54) LMNATAS1R3TAS1R1TAS1R2PDE2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20140243335-A1 SUBSTITUTED HYDOXAMIC ACIDS AND USES THEREOF MILLENNIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (US) 2014-08-28 US disclosed
US-20120015943-A1 SUBSTITUTED HYDROXAMIC ACIDS AND USES THEREOF MILLENNIUM PHARMACUTICALS, INC. (US) 2012-01-19 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120015943-A1 SUBSTITUTED HYDROXAMIC ACIDS AND USES THEREOF HDAC6, HDAC1, HDAC2 LMNA 1529/4885TAS1R3 3594/4885TAS1R1 3179/4885
US-20140243335-A1 SUBSTITUTED HYDOXAMIC ACIDS AND USES THEREOF HDAC6, HDAC1, H1-3 LMNA 2546/4885TAS1R3 3997/4885TAS1R1 3610/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.