Predicted protein targets (top 12)
| gene | UniProt | supporting neighbours | confidence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ | CRHR1 | P34998 | 6/20 | 0.41 |
| ▸ | HSP90AA1 | P07900 | 1/20 | 0.39 |
| ▸ | HSP90AB1 | P08238 | 1/20 | 0.39 |
| ▸ | HSD11B1 | P28845 | 1/20 | 0.38 |
| ▸ | CNR1 | P21554 | 6/20 | 0.37 |
| ▸ | MAPT | P10636 | 1/20 | 0.37 |
| ▸ | HPGD | P15428 | 1/20 | 0.37 |
| ▸ | CNR2 | P34972 | 3/20 | 0.37 |
| ▸ | MAOA | P21397 | 2/20 | 0.37 |
| ▸ | MAOB | P27338 | 2/20 | 0.37 |
| ▸ | ACHE | P22303 | 1/20 | 0.36 |
| ▸ | OPRL1 | P41146 | 1/20 | 0.36 |
Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.
Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules
Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.
| Compound | similarity | top predicted | shared targets | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHEMBL10286341 | 0.82 | ACHE (0.38) | HPGDCNR2ACHE | |
| SCHEMBL10286055 | 0.81 | HRH2 (0.41) | MAPTHPGDACHE | |
| SCHEMBL10286305 | 0.81 | ACHE (0.36) | ACHE | |
| SCHEMBL10286194 | 0.80 | ACHE (0.40) | ACHE | |
| SCHEMBL10286067 | 0.78 | ACHE (0.41) | HPGDCNR2ACHE | |
| SCHEMBL10286349 | 0.77 | ACHE (0.45) | MAPTHPGDACHE | |
| SCHEMBL10286098 | 0.77 | ACHE (0.39) | ACHE | |
| SCHEMBL10286344 | 0.77 | ACHE (0.40) | MAPTACHE | |
| SCHEMBL526851 | 0.76 | ACHE (0.44) | ACHE | |
| SCHEMBL10286333 | 0.75 | UGT2B17 (0.45) | MAPTHPGDACHE |
Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.
Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them
Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.
| Patent | Title | Assignee | Published | Priority | Filing | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US-20130102631-A1 | NOVEL MICROBIOCIDAL DIOXIME ETHER DERIVATIVES | SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) | 2013-04-25 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-20130102631-A1 | NOVEL MICROBIOCIDAL DIOXIME ETHER DERIVATIVES | SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION LLC (US) | 2013-04-25 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| WO-2012001040-A1 | NOVEL MICROBIOCIDAL DIOXIME ETHER DERIVATIVES | SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) | 2012-01-05 | — | — | WO | disclosed |
Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?
For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.
| Patent | Title | Text reads most about | Predicted target · text-rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| US-20130102631-A1 | NOVEL MICROBIOCIDAL DIOXIME ETHER DERIVATIVES | MSR1, DDT, MPO | CRHR1 4180/4885HSP90AA1 3488/4885HSP90AB1 3704/4885 |
“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.